Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

WATERMARK AT ALMADEN, THELicense 435202775
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Page 2 of 3. Facility staff are not answering resident’s call button. On 5/2/2025, the Department interviewed 1 staff (S1). S1 stated the call button system alerts the facility staff via pager every 5 minutes until the alert is not cleared. S1 stated the residents receiving incontinence care require facility staff to change incontinence products are often as necessary. S1 stated the facility staff will document when they have provided incontinence assistance to resident. On 7/3/2025, LPA Rai interviewed 4 staff (S1-S4). Four out of four staff stated they do not have call buttons for residents that require incontinent care. Four out of four staff stated they have not seen or heard staff not answering resident’s call button. On 7/3/2025, LPA Rai interviewed 5 residents (R1-R5). Five out of five residents refused to be interviewed during the visit. Based on review of call button report for March 2025 and April 2025, facility staff are responding to resident’s call buttons and there hasn’t been one entry where the staff did not answer to a resident’s call button request. Facility staff are not providing incontinence care at night to residents. On 5/2/2025, the Department interviewed 1 staff. S1 stated the residents receiving incontinence care require facility staff to change incontinence products are often as necessary. S1 stated the facility staff will document when they have provided incontinence assistance to resident. On 7/3/2025, LPA Rai interviewed 4 staff (S1-S4). Four out of four staff stated they have not seen or heard facility staff not provide incontinence care at night. Three out of four staff stated they have seen some residents that require attention in the morning with incontinence care, but that does not meet the resident has not been provided with incontinence care at night. Page 3 of 3. On 7/3/2025, LPA Rai interviewed 5 residents (R1-R5). Five out of five residents refused to be interviewed during the visit. Based on review of 5 random residents (R1-R5) who require incontinent care, 5 out of 5 residents received incontinent care at night in April 2025. The Department has completed the investigation of the above allegations. Based on interviews conducted and record reviews, the department has found that the above allegations were UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or are without a reasonable basis. No deficiencies cited from California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Exit interview conducted with Business Office Director, Melissa Lummis and a copy of the report was provided.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 3, 2025 inspection of WATERMARK AT ALMADEN, THE?

This was a complaint inspection of WATERMARK AT ALMADEN, THE on July 3, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to WATERMARK AT ALMADEN, THE on July 3, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.