Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

CAMPBELL VILLAGELicense 4352942241 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Admin indicated that while the call pendants do not contact staff radios, they do successfully ping the alert system on the front desk computer. LPA and Admin toured the area where call pendants do not work. LPA asked a resident (R1) to press their call pendant. LPA observed no radios receive the alert, despite Admin holding one. LPA asked R1 if he/she had ever been inconvenienced or effected by the call pendants not working in the area. R1 stated that at one point, he/she had fallen in his/her room and had trouble getting up. R1 pressed the call pendant for assistance, but nobody ever arrived to help him/her up. R1 stated that this was how he/she learned that the call button doesn't work in his/her room. R1 stated that the pendant itself works, as it will go off successfully in the activities area, it just doesn't work in his/her room and the area outside of it. LPA returned to the front desk to observed whether or not pendant presses successfully alert the computer. 1 out of 2 pendant presses were observed to alert the computer system. LPA observed 3 pendant presses accurately be reported in the call log from areas outside the dead zone. No radios were heard to have received the alert. Review of facility receipts with vendor confirm that the facility has purchased the parts to repair the system. Review of facility call logs do not indicate any calls having reached the system from the affected area. The Department has conducted an investigation of the above allegation. Based on LPA observation, resident/staff interviews, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the Department found the above allegation to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiencies are being cited. See LIC 9099-D. Exit interview conducted with Administrative Assistant Maria Perlas, Administrator Geralyn de Ocampo had to leave during inspection and gave Maria Perlas permission to sign on her behalf. A copy of this report, along with the facility's appeals rights were provided

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87303(i)(1)(A)Type A

    87303 - Maintenance and Operation - (i) Facilities shall have signal systems which shall meet the following criteria ... (A) Operate from each resident's living unit. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA observation, interviews, and records review, 5 rooms in the facility have had a non operational signal system for more than 2 months. This poses an immediate risk to the personal rights of residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 3, 2022 inspection of CAMPBELL VILLAGE?

This was a complaint inspection of CAMPBELL VILLAGE on March 3, 2022. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to CAMPBELL VILLAGE on March 3, 2022?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (1 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "87303 - Maintenance and Operation - (i) Facilities shall have signal systems which shall meet the following criteria ......"

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.