Public Record
Campbell Village
Is this your facility?Correct anything the record gets wrong or is out of date.
Researching this facility professionally?Book a 15-minute call
About this facility
Operating details and county context
Operating details
- Capacity
- 90 residents
- Phone
- (408) 378-2535
- Address
- 290 N. San Tomas Aquino Road
- Licensed since
Santa Clara County context
258*CCLD
Total facilities
4.5*CCLD
Avg citations
9.4*CCLD
Avg visits
2.9*CCLD
Avg complaint visits
*CCLD: California Community Care Licensing Division. Updated weekly. Last refresh .
Citations
8 citations on record
Every regulation cited on a CCLD inspection of this facility, sourced from the public record. Each row links to the visit’s inspector narrative.
What does Type A vs Type B mean?
Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.
Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.
2025
- 87463(a)Type B
87463 Reappraisals (a) The pre-admission appraisal… shall be updated in writing as frequently as necessary …to note significant changes in condition…and to keep the appraisal accurate…This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted, the changes facility ADM stated she implemented to address R1’s falls were not reflected on R1’s Needs and Services Plan. ADM acknowledged she did not update the care plan. This poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
- 87457(c)Type B
87457 Pre-Admission Appraisal (c) Prior to admission a determination of the prospective resident's suitability for admission shall be completed ... their individual service needs ... specified in Section 87455, Acceptance and Retention Limitations. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, the residents pre admission appraisal was not filled out and had missing information such as Residents Name & Age, Health, physical disabilities, mental condition, health history & social factors. This poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
2024
- 87307(d)(6)Type A
Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. While touring resident bedroom 111, LPAs observed a plastic tube obstructing the sliding glass door, preventing the door from opening which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
- 87303(a)Type A
Based on observation and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. While touring Memory Care, LPAs tested delayed egress door #4 (next to resident rooms #124 and #125). LPAs pushed the door completely open, and the delayed egress did not sound the alarm which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
- 87468.2(a)(4)Type A
87468.2 Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities (a) In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1, Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities, residents in privately operated residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (4) To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet their needs. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Licensee did not ensure that resident R1 did not elope from the facility unassisted, which poses an immediate safety risk to residents in care.
- 87211(a)(1)(D)Type B
87211 Reporting Requirements (a)(1)(D) Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident... or other residents, or unexplained absence of any resident.This requirement was not met as evidenced by; Based on interview & record review, the facility did not send an incident report regarding R1's falls on February 7, 2024, March 2 and 7, 2024, and May 13, 2024. Staff S1 stated he/she didn't send an incident report for these falls. This poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
2022
- 80088(e)(1)Type B
Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as the water temperature was measured to beneath 105 *F in 3 out of 3 tested bathrooms which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
- 87303(i)(1)(A)Type A
87303 - Maintenance and Operation - (i) Facilities shall have signal systems which shall meet the following criteria ... (A) Operate from each resident's living unit. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA observation, interviews, and records review, 5 rooms in the facility have had a non operational signal system for more than 2 months. This poses an immediate risk to the personal rights of residents in care.
Inspection record
26 visits on record since 2021. Most recent on 2026-03-26.
4 routine inspections, 10 complaint visits. 8 complaints on record, 1 of 8 substantiated.
- OtherNo citationsRead inspector’s narrative
- OtherNo citationsRead inspector’s narrative
- InspectionNo citationsRead inspector’s narrative
- OtherNo citationsRead inspector’s narrative
- ComplaintNo citationsRead inspector’s narrative
- ComplaintNo citationsRead inspector’s narrative
- ComplaintNo citationsRead inspector’s narrative
- OtherNo citationsRead inspector’s narrative
- Other1 Type BRead inspector’s narrative
- ComplaintNo citationsRead inspector’s narrative
- OtherNo citationsRead inspector’s narrative
- Other1 Type BRead inspector’s narrative
- OtherNo citationsRead inspector’s narrative
- OtherNo citationsRead inspector’s narrative
- OtherNo citationsRead inspector’s narrative
- ComplaintNo citationsRead inspector’s narrative
- Inspection2 Type ARead inspector’s narrative
- Other1 Type ARead inspector’s narrative
- Other1 Type BRead inspector’s narrative
- ComplaintNo citationsRead inspector’s narrative
- Inspection1 Type BRead inspector’s narrative
- Complaint1 Type ARead inspector’s narrative
- ComplaintNo citationsRead inspector’s narrative
- InspectionNo citationsRead inspector’s narrative
8 citations across the record on file
Nearby
Other licensed assisted living facilities in Campbell
FAQ
Common questions about this facility
Is Campbell Village licensed in California?
Yes, Campbell Village is currently licensed in California. It has been licensed since 2006.
How many citations does Campbell Village have?
Campbell Village has 8 citations on record: 4 Type A (more serious) and 4 Type B citations. It has received 26 visits (4 inspections, 10 complaint visits, 12 other visits).
When was Campbell Village last inspected?
Campbell Village was last inspected on March 26, 2026 (about 2 months ago). California inspects licensed assisted living facilities (RCFEs) on a periodic basis or following a complaint.
What type of assisted living facility is Campbell Village?
Campbell Village is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE), which is a licensed assisted living facility serving older adults with a licensed capacity of 90 residents. It is located in Campbell, Santa Clara County, California.
How does Campbell Village compare to other assisted living facilities in Santa Clara County?
Campbell Village has 8 citations. The county average is 4.5 citations per facility. There are 258 assisted living facilities in Santa Clara County.
Does Campbell Village have any serious violations?
Campbell Village has 4 Type A citations on record. Type A citations indicate conditions that pose an immediate health or safety risk to residents. Review the inspection timeline above for details on each citation.
Has Campbell Village had any complaint inspections?
Campbell Village has received 10 complaint-triggered inspections. 1 resulted in substantiated findings. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern to CCLD.
Next steps for this record
If this is your facility,and correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.
Researching professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.