Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

CAMPBELL VILLAGELicense 435294224
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

During interviews with 4 residents, 1 out of 4 residents stated that contracted facility staff had touched them inappropriately. 3 out of 4 residents had stated that they had never felt unsafe with staff nor been approached inappropriately while receiving care from staff. 4 out of 4 residents stated that they are satisfied with the quality of care provided by the facility. In interviews with facility staff 2 out of 2 facility staff members stated that they had never had any residents report or express concern over potential sexual assault at the facility. 2 out of 2 facility staff had never been given cause to suspect potential sexual abuse from other staff members, contracted or otherwise. In interviews with the facility's additional staffing contracting agency, Care On Call, one administrative staff stated that they have never had reports from Campbell Village regarding potential sexual assault. 3 out of 3 parties interviewed stated that the suspected abuser (SA) identified by 1 out of 4 residents had no prior history of abuse or misconduct on record. SA was discharged from Campbell Village and no longer works for Care On Call for reasons outside of alleged incident. During course of investigation, The department made 4 attempts to interview SA. After agreeing to meet with the department, SA failed to arrive at the designated meeting location, and was unable to be contacted afterward. As of 01/01/2022, SA has been unable to be contacted by both police and department investigators. The Department has investigated the above allegation. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the Department found that the above allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An unsubstantiated finding indicates that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegation did or did not occur. This report was reviewed with Administrator Geralyn de Ocampo and a copy of the report was provided.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87303(i)(1)(A)Type A

    87303 - Maintenance and Operation - (i) Facilities shall have signal systems which shall meet the following criteria ... (A) Operate from each resident's living unit. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA observation, interviews, and records review, 5 rooms in the facility have had a non operational signal system for more than 2 months. This poses an immediate risk to the personal rights of residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 3, 2022 inspection of CAMPBELL VILLAGE?

This was a complaint inspection of CAMPBELL VILLAGE on March 3, 2022. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to CAMPBELL VILLAGE on March 3, 2022?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.