Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

VILLA FONTANALicense 435294328
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Staff provided false information about a resident's health: On 11/20/2020, LPA interviewed administrator (ADM). ADM stated that on 3/8/2020, a staff (S1) inadvertently provided health information of resident (R2) to resident (R3's) family member. LPA interviewed staff (S1). S1 stated that R3's file was pulled incorrectly. R3's family was called and informed that R3 was ill instead of R2's family. R3's family became very worried about R3. R3 became very upset with the mixed up. R3 was not ill nor had health issues. ADM and S1 stated that the facility did not provide false information about a resident's health but just called the wrong family member. Facility had molds that exacerbated resident's health conditions: On 11/20/2020, LPA interviewed third party contractor (C1) and ADM. C1 stated that during contraction there were no evidence of molds found in the facility and the noise coming from the construction. During investigation, ADM provided a copy of facility mold inspection report dated 11/25/2020 that states, "No visible suspect mold growth or elevated moisture found at the time of inspection." ADM stated that R3's room was inspected including bathroom. ADM stated that there were no molds found in R3's bedroom and bathroom. ADM stated that staff were cleaning R3's room once a week or as needed. ADM stated that the facility was being cleaned such as but not limited to vacuuming carpets, wiping tables, cleaning bathroom and bath tubs. ADM stated that there was no medical records to indicate that R3's heath condition was exacerbated by molds or by the noise coming from the construction. ADM stated that R3 did not report any health concerns to the facility. Continued, see LIC 9099-C, page 3 of 3 Residents had an outdoor physical activities on days with poor air quality: On 11/20/2020, LPA interviewed the facility Activity Director (S10) and the Activity Assistant (S11). Staff S10 and S11 denied the allegation that activities were conducted outdoor despite poor air quality. S10 and S11 stated that before an outdoor activities, they had to check the air quality before the outdoor activity. If the air quality was not good, then the outdoor activity either moved to indoor or canceled. LPA interviewed 3 residents (R2, R4 and R8). All residents stated that they had outdoor activity sometime in July and August 2020 wherein the air quality was good and also stated the facility conducts indoor activity when air quality was bad. Facility food menu does not have options for those on special diets: Foods served in the facility does not meet the recommended dietary allowance On 11/20/2020, LPA interviewed ADM and staff. ADM and dietary manager and assistant dietary manager (S12 and S13) stated that the facility does not have special diets written on the facility menu, however, the facility is able to accommodate residents' special request outside from the facility menu and the facility adheres to residents with special or modified diet order. S12 and S13 stated that they modify food menu when needed, and residents were free to request changes on the food menu. On 11/25/2020, LPA interviewed 5 residents (R8- R12), 5 of 5 residents stated the facility provides a modified diet and food options outside the facility menu. All 5 residents did not have any complaints about the facility menu or food being served. On 10/29/20, LPA observed meals during dinner time, the food served comprised of the following mixed vegetables, potatoes, bread and chicken, soup, a glass of water, cup of coffee, banana, green salad and a dessert. The department has investigated the above allegations. Based on the investigation, observations, records reviewed, and interviews conducted, the Department found that the above allegations are UNFOUNDED , meaning that the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. No deficiencies or citations noted at today’s compliant investigation visit. Exit interview conducted with Administrator. A copy of this report was provided via email for signature.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 7, 2021 inspection of VILLA FONTANA?

This was a complaint inspection of VILLA FONTANA on April 7, 2021. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to VILLA FONTANA on April 7, 2021?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.