Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Office review

PEOPLE'S CARE CHARMIANLicense 4968036391 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Manager Victoria Bertozzi and Licensing Program Analyst Christi Coppo conducted an informal office meeting, and met with Administrator, Patrick Seawright and John O'Brien District Manager (DM) for licensee and Michelle Mainez COO of licensee. Informal meeting to address concerns identified by the Department during a recent Complaint Investigation. DM indicated they had lots of meetings about this incident and agree that the course of action taken by Admin was not appropriate and they have addressed it with Admin. Going forward, the staff have all been retrained about communicating about residents' care needs in order to prevent residents from experiencing pain unaddressed. Admin wants it noted that there was not any malice or purposeful neglect to not get the medical attention for R1. The complaint investigation revealed that a client was observed on with a “heat blister” on 2/12/2024 by facility staff. Staff documented the blister on the facility’s internal system and per interviews, Administrator was notified of the blister the same day. The Administrator did not seek medical treatment via the emergency room despite client presenting with a raised blister. Staff noted that on the NOC shift the client was “whining” during repositioning. On 2/13/2024, staff noted that they observed the blister had grown bigger, was red, and filled with liquid. Interviews conducted during investigation revealed that the blister ruptured on 2/14/2024. Administrator did not seek medical treatment via the emergency room when blister ruptured. LPM Bertozzi spoke with Administrator on 2/15/2024 around 2:00pm. Administrator told LPM that they had emailed the client’s doctor between 9:00am and 11:00am but was unsure if the doctor had responded. CCL staff advised the Administrator to seek emergency medical treatment for the client, but Administrator indicated that they were going to wait for the doctor to respond. Continued on LIC809C Continued from LIC809 LPM directed Administrator to call the doctor and notify the office staff to assist in expedited guidance from the doctor. Eventually, the client’s doctor directed the Administrator to seek emergency medical treatment, which they did on 2/15/2024 at approximately 4:54pm. LPM spoke directly with Administrator regarding a perceived refusal on the part of the Administrator to seek medical attention for the client. Administrator disagreed that they refused and indicated that they were unsure how to proceed as the injury was not something that they have previously encountered. Parties discussed the changes that facility has made to their protocols to ensure residents' needs are met timely as well as the interaction between the Administrator and CCL staff. Deficiencies cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of California Regulation and the Health and Safety Code. Appeal rights given and discussed with Administrator. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12 month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report was given.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87405(d)(a)(1)Type A

    87405(d)(a) - (d)The administrator shall have the qualifications specified... (1) Knowledge of the requirements for providing care and supervision appropriate to the residents.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on CCL complaint inspection, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that facility Administrator did not seek timely medical attention for resident R1, which posed an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 29, 2024 inspection of PEOPLE'S CARE CHARMIAN?

This was an other inspection of PEOPLE'S CARE CHARMIAN on May 29, 2024. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to PEOPLE'S CARE CHARMIAN on May 29, 2024?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (1 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "87405(d)(a) - (d)The administrator shall have the qualifications specified... (1) Knowledge of the requirements for pro..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was an other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.