Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

IVY PARK AT PINERLicense 496804112
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Continued from LIC9099... The investigation revealed both residents, R1 & R2 were on hospice care. Record reviews and interviews regarding resident care services, medication assistance, incontinent care plan/assistance, including hospice services, had obtained different information than reported to the Department. There was no information obtained to support that violations had occurred regarding the allegations. There was differing information from parties interviewed, and per record review. The interviews conducted with various staff found that staff were able to communicate with the LPA, answer LPA's questions, and speak to the LPA in English; it is not known if before this complaint any staff were not able to communicate clearly. S1 stated that all staff are hired only if they can communicate with all residents, and English is required. Facility's record reviews and interviews obtained no information that staff had not provided a comfortable environment and/or that staff were rough with providing care to R2 or R1 while on hospice/ and in the facility. Records reviewed regarding care services, no information obtained that supported a violation occurred regarding record keeping and/or progress notes reviewed. The Hospice Agency Director of Patient Services, in summary, stated to the LPA that the hospice staff are very good about documenting notes regarding a resident, care services and/or concerns. In review of R2's case notes there are no concerns regarding care being provided to the resident, no medication concerns, R2 was getting their medications as needed, and there is no documented concerns of any neglect of the resident/R2. Hospice staff would report concerns/neglect of any kind as mandated reporters if observed/suspected. There was no information obtained during the investigation, and interview with hospice agency to support a violation had occurred regarding the allegations. Based on the interviews, record/document reviews, and related information obtained during the investigation, the allegations of "facility staff did not provide a comfortable environment for a resident, facility staff handled a resident (s) in a rough manner, facility staff did not communicate with a resident, and their family, due to a language barrier, facility staff did not keep accurate records on a resident, and facility staff mismanaged a resident's medications" are Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview was conducted with the Administrator Eric Perry

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the June 20, 2024 inspection of IVY PARK AT PINER?

This was a complaint inspection of IVY PARK AT PINER on June 20, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to IVY PARK AT PINER on June 20, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.