Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Incident investigation

MIRABEL LODGELicense 4968041221 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Christi Coppo and Ethel Contreras arrived at this facility unannounced to conduct a case management visit and was greeted by caregiver. Licensee on site but was not inside facility when LPA arrived. Licensee arrived inside facility later. LPA met with licensee Alex Varshavsky. Upon entering the facility LPA observed caregiver alone in medication room. LPA asked if licensee was here and S3 responded yes but that they did not know where he was at, he was “some place around the facility.” LPA then observed S3 to exit the med room carrying a tray of medications. LPA asked S3 if they were going to pass the medications on the tray and S3 responded yes. S3 went on to start passing the meds on their own without licensee. LPA waited for licensee in the dining room. Licensee showed up about 15 minutes later. LPA asked licensee if S3 had completed their medication training in order to pass medications on their own. Licensee responded that he was still training S3. LPA asked licensee for S3’s medication training. LPA reviewed S3’s training records. LPA observed medication test present in S3’s file. LPA observed 1 hour of “Understanding California Medication Regulations,” completed on 2/21/25. No other documentation of medication training present. ( deficiency cited, see 809D ). On 1/13/26 facility submitted an Incident Report (IR) for resident (R1) indicating that on 1/8/26 R1 was sent to the doctor and then the emergency room. However, IR did not indicate the nature of the event, symptoms exhibited or any cause for sending R1 to the emergency room, report did not provide description of any findings or treatment if any occurred at the hospital, or when/if R1 returned to the facility. On 1/23/26 facility submitted an IR for resident (R2) indicating that on 1/23/26 R2 was sent to the emergency room. However, Continued on 809C... Continued from 809... IR did not indicate the findings or treatment if any occurred at the hospital nor did it indicate whether or not R2 returned to the facility. On 1/23/26 facility submitted an IR for resident (R3) indicating that on 1/18/26 R3 was sent to the emergency room. However, IR did not indicate the findings or treatment if any occurred at the hospital, nor did IR indicate whether or not R3 returned to the facility. Attending physician's name not listed on any of the IRs submitted. Per regulation 87211, the facility is required to submit an IR to CCL for any incident, including but limited to, those which threaten the welfare, safety or health of any resident, such as psychological abuse of a resident by staff or other residents, or unexplained absence of any resident. Additionally, the report shall include the resident's name, age, sex and date of admission; date and nature of event; attending physician's name, findings, and treatment, if any; and disposition of the case. LPA discussed Reporting Requirements regulation with licensee and importance of submitting complete reports in compliance with regulation 87211, including the findings, treatment, and disposition of the incident being reported.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.69Type B

    §1569.69 Employees assisting residents with self-administration of medication; training requirements (a)(1) In facilities licensed to provide care for 16 or more persons, the employee shall complete 24 hours of initial training. This training shall consist of 16 hours of hands-on shadowing training which shall be completed prior to assisting with the self-administration of medications, and 8 hours of other training or instruction, as described in subdivision (f), which shall be completed within the first four weeks of employment. This requirement not met by licensee as evidenced by: Based on LPA record review, current documentation of medication training or medication shadow training not present for S3, which poses an potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 27, 2026 inspection of MIRABEL LODGE?

This was a other inspection of MIRABEL LODGE on January 27, 2026. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to MIRABEL LODGE on January 27, 2026?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "§1569.69 Employees assisting residents with self-administration of medication; training requirements (a)(1) In facilitie..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.