Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

EMERALD OAKSLicense 515002765
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Residents do not receive food in a timely manner and Staff serve residents cold food . During the investigation process, the administrative assistant, five staff persons and five residents were interviewed. In addition, the facility’s food service policy and menu were reviewed. It was reported that meals are served at 8:00 a.m., 12:00 p.m., and 5:00 p.m. and that snacks are provided twice a day. It was stated that residents either eat in the dining room or in their rooms. A walk through of the kitchen was conducted and the lunch menu consisted of Salisbury steak, green beans, potatoes with gravy, rice crispy treats and/or sugar free Jell-O. The cook advised that she serves 50 residents in the dining area and 11-15 residents are given tray service in their rooms. The cook stated that the care providers and the med technicians assist when serving the residents, as needed. Dinner was also in preparation and was observed to be lemon chicken, vegetables and rolls. The food being served appeared to be of good nutrition and was being served hot. A menu was observed in the kitchen and the cook was following the daily menu. During the interview process, overall, it was reported that the residents do receive their food in a timely manner and that residents are not served cold food. It could not be proven that Residents do not receive food in a timely manner and that Staff serve residents cold food. Although the allegations may have happened, or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred, and the findings are Unsubstantiated . continued Staff do not follow protocol to prevent the spread of illness . During the investigation process, the administrative assistant, four staff persons and two residents were interviewed. In addition, supportive documents that were provided included a Physician Reports, Admission Agreements, Resident Appraisal and laboratory results. It was reported that two residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) may have had Clostridium Difficile (C-Diff). During the interview process, it was stated that during the month of January 2021 it was suspected that the residents had C-Diff; therefore, the staff set up a Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) station near the residents’ rooms for precautions. The facility provided copies of the C-Diff results which indicated that the residents were negative. It could not be proven that Staff do not follow protocol to prevent the spread of illness. Although the allegation may have happened, or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, and the findings are Unsubstantiated . Facility has bed bugs . During the investigation process, the administrative assistant, four staff persons and two residents were interviewed. In addition, invoices were received and reviewed from the pest control company. continued Prior to the complaint and during the month of June 2021, a pest control company was treating the facility for bed bugs. In addition, when the facility noticed that they had bed bugs, they notified the licensing agency via incident report. The administrator assistant reported that the pest control company continues to come to the facility on a monthly basis and also checks specifically for bed bugs. Copies of invoices from the pest control company were provided and verified for the months of January through June 2021. Although the allegation may have happened, or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, and the findings are Unsubstantiated .

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87625(b)(5)Type A

    87625 (b)(5) Managed Incontinence - In addition to Section 87611, General Requirements for Allowable Health Conditions, the licensee shall be responsible for the following: Ensuring that the appropriately skilled professional developing the bowel and/or bladder program provide training to facility staff responsible for implementation of the program. The licensee did not ensure that training was provided by a skilled professional for staff that are providing incontinence care to residents. This poses an immediate safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 12, 2022 inspection of EMERALD OAKS?

This was a complaint inspection of EMERALD OAKS on April 12, 2022. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to EMERALD OAKS on April 12, 2022?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.