Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

EMERALD OAKSLicense 515002765
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

A resident is being transferred from bed to toilet in an unsafe manner . During the investigation process the assistant administrator and five staff persons were interviewed. In addition, the resident (Resident 1) was interviewed. Documentation was received and reviewed to include the Physician’s Report, Admission Agreement, How to use a Hoyer Lift requirement and a Hoyer Lift Inservice Signoff document. During the initial visit at the facility, Misty Valencia and Dawn Keene, two Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) went to the resident’s room to view the concern of the Hoyer Lift being moved from the resident’s bed to the bathroom. It was reported and observed by the LPAs that the threshold was at a “normal height.” All staff persons reported that there was not a problem with using the Hoyer Lift with the resident and that the Hoyer Lift was always used with two staff persons assisting. The resident was interviewed, and she reported that she felt “safe” when the staff persons were using the Hoyer Lift. There was no report that an incident occurred with a transfer in an unsafe manner. Records were received and reviewed indicating that staff have been trained in using a Hoyer Lift. It could not be proven that A resident is being transferred from bed to toilet in an unsafe manner. Although the allegation may have happened, or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, and the findings are Unsubstantiated . continued Resident left in bed in her own urine . During the investigation process the assistant administrator and five staff persons were interviewed. The resident (Resident 1) was not interviewed, as she is no longer residing at the facility. Documentation was received and reviewed to include the Physician’s Report and Admission Agreement. It was reported that the resident needed assistance in incontinence issues. All staff persons advised that they were not aware that the resident was left in bed in her own urine, as the resident was on an incontinence schedule that they followed. It could not be proven that A resident was left in her bed in her own urine. Although the allegation may have happened, or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, and the findings are Unsubstantiated . Although it was not indicated that the resident was left in bed in her own urine, the staff are required to follow a bowel and bladder program developed by a skilled professional. The staff have indicated that they followed a schedule; however, the staff have not been trained by a skilled professional, as required. Based on this information, the facility shall be cited on a separate report, LIC 809, on this date. (See LIC 809).

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87625(b)(5)Type A

    87625 (b)(5) Managed Incontinence - In addition to Section 87611, General Requirements for Allowable Health Conditions, the licensee shall be responsible for the following: Ensuring that the appropriately skilled professional developing the bowel and/or bladder program provide training to facility staff responsible for implementation of the program. The licensee did not ensure that training was provided by a skilled professional for staff that are providing incontinence care to residents. This poses an immediate safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 12, 2022 inspection of EMERALD OAKS?

This was a complaint inspection of EMERALD OAKS on April 12, 2022. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to EMERALD OAKS on April 12, 2022?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.