Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Routine inspection (multi-day)

VENTURA GRAND CHATEAULicense 5658024722 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Cortez conducted an unannounced Annual Continuation Visit to the facility to continue the annual inspection visit initiated on 12/21/2023. The LPA was greeted by MedTech Jennifer Diaz and informed them of the reason for the visit. Administrator Sean Beharry could not be present during the visit today and authorized MT Hazel Aspillaga to review and sign the report. Today the LPA conducted a medication audit, interviewed three staff, and finished the record review initiated on 12/21/2023. Interviews: During today’s visit, the LPA conducted three (3) staff interviews. Medications: At 1:45 p.m. a medications review was initiated for three out of five residents and the following was observed. The medications were stored in the medication room, which is locked and inaccessible to the residents. During Resident #3 (R#3's) audit, the LPA observed Donepezil HCL 5MG Tab still in the bubble pack, however the plastic bubble was punched out but medication not successfully poured out. MT Jennifer Diaz stated that when medication is not given it will be documented on the Medication Administration Record (MAR). However there was no documentation on R3’s MAR that the medication was not given. Record Review: The LPA observed documentation of Infection Control plan, Disaster prevention and Insurance liability. The LPA reviewed five (5) out of thirty-seven (37) resident files. The LPA was not able to review any of the five residents’ admissions agreements, due to them being stored in a separate file in the Administrators office. The administrator was not available for todays visit, and staff does not have access to the office. Out of the five files reviewed, the LPA identified that three files were missing the safeguards for property/valuables form, (SPV), two residents (R2,R5) did not have signed resident rights forms (LIC613), and three residents (R2, R3, R4) did not have their appraisal/needs and services form (LIC625) signed by the resident and/or their responsible party. Pursuant to Title 22 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D): Exit interview conducted and copy of the report and appeal rights provided.

Citations

4 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87506(b)Type B

    Resident record must include minimum required items

    Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in as LPA could not review admissions agreements, and 3 residents were missing SPV forms, 2 residents did not have signed resident rights forms which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • Right to accept or decline care or services

    87468.1(a)(16) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: To receive or reject medical care or other services. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, the licensee did not allow R1 the personal right to reject the service of showers, as R1 and other residents are being forced to shower which posed a potential person right risk to residents in care.

  • 87506(a)Type B

    Maintain separate complete record for each resident

    87506(a) Resident Records. A separate, complete, and current record shall be maintained for each resident in the facility, readily available to facility staff and to licensing agency staff and shall contained specified information. Based on record review, the licensee did not have a complete and current record of shower refusals for R1 which poses a potential person right risk to residents in care.

  • Assist residents with self-administered medication

    Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as medication for R3 was not given 1/22/24 which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 26, 2024 inspection of VENTURA GRAND CHATEAU?

This was an other inspection of VENTURA GRAND CHATEAU on January 26, 2024. 2 citations were issued: 1 Type A (serious) and 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to VENTURA GRAND CHATEAU on January 26, 2024?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (1 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in as LPA could not review admissions a..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was an other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.