Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

VENTURA GRAND CHATEAULicense 5658024722 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Regarding the allegations, “Staff did not treat residents with dignity and respect, Staff did not provide a safe and comfortable environment for residents and Staff member handles residents in a rough manner,” it is the concern of the reporting party that Staff 1 (S1) is not very friendly to the residents, lacks respect in their treatment of them, behaves harshly, shows impatience, handles residents roughly, that certain residents are fearful of S1, and are unhappy when S1 is around. It was further reported that on 06/27/2024, S1 was witnessed roughly grabbing a resident (name unknown, no injuries reported). Interviews conducted with staff revealed that majority of the staff interviewed have witnessed S1, handling the residents in a rough manner by pulling them, yelling at the residents, not allowing residents to wandered around the facility freely and not treating them with respect. Some staff went to say they have witnessed S1 hit some of the residents (No injuries were reported). Interview with Administrator Sean Beharry confirmed that residents, staff and resident’s family members have voiced concerns regarding S1 and how they treat the residents. File review revealed that personal rights have been previously addressed with S1. S1 was interviewed and denied the allegations. However, based on statements from witnesses, the allegations listed above are deemed Substantiated at this time. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiency was cited (refer to LIC 9099-D). Exit Interview conducted. A copy of the report and appeal rights were issued. Regarding the allegation, “Staff member did not provide resident with clean linen ,” it is the concern of the reporting party that S1 retaliated against a resident by not providing a top sheet for them but providing one for their roommate. Date was not provided. To investigate the allegation, the LPA conducted interviews with Staff, residents, and resident’s; however, the individuals were not present during the incident and therefore, could not offer sufficient information regarding whether it did or did not occur. Staff further revealed that even though S1 is not a good care giver, they are a good housekeeper. S1 was interviewed, denied allegation and further revealed that it is not part of their responsibility to make the resident’s beds, unless they are instructed to and if so they ensure that the resident’s beds are properly made with all the bedsheets. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not sufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Report Provided.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • Dignity in personal relationships

    87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a) Residents .. shall have all of the following personal rights: (1) To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff,(... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as witnesses stated residents are not treated with respect, by S1 which poses an immidiate health and safety risk to resident in care.

  • Protection from punishment and intimidation

    (3) To be free from punishment, humiliation, intimidation, abuse, or other actions of a punitive nature, such as withholding residents’ money or interfering with daily living functions such as eating, sleeping, or elimination. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews the Licensee did not comply with the regulation above, as witnesses stated residents are being handled roughly, pulled, and hit by S1 which is an immediate health, saftey and personal rights risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 13, 2025 inspection of VENTURA GRAND CHATEAU?

This was a complaint inspection of VENTURA GRAND CHATEAU on May 13, 2025. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to VENTURA GRAND CHATEAU on May 13, 2025?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (2 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a) Residents .. shall have all of the following personal rights:..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.