Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

AASTA ASSISTED LIVINGLicense 5658501581 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Continued from LIC9099 On the allegation: “ Due to lack of supervision, resident hit another resident causing injury " The Responsible Party (RP) expressed concern that they believes the staff to resident ration is poor or inadequate. During the initial visit, LPA Conway conducted interviews with the two (2) residents involved in the reported incident. However, due to both individuals having a diagnosis of dementia, neither resident was able to clearly recall or articulate the events that took place on that day. LPA interviewed facility ED stating that she was not present at the facility when the incident occurred but reported that staff responded to the residents promptly. During staff interviews, it was consistently reported that the facility is experiencing ongoing staffing shortages, which has made it increasingly difficult for caregivers to adequately attend to all residents' needs. Staffs acknowledged that facility policy mandates 15 minute safety checks, however, these are not being properly conducted due to insufficient personnel, stating that it is not possible to conduct these checks as require and as a result, residents are at risk of injury. In fact, due to the current staffing situation, there have been multiple incidents involving resident hitting other residents and falls that required hospitalization. Additionally, staff reported that certain caregivers are frequently observed using their personal phones during work hours, resulting in inadequate supervision and reduced attention to residents' needs and safety. Based on information and the evidence gathered during the course of the investigation, there is sufficient evidence to determine that due to lack of supervision a resident hit another resident causing an injury. Therefore, the above allegation “ Due to lack of supervision, resident hit another resident causing injury ” is deemed SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Pursuant to Title 22, California Code of Regulations and/or CA Health and Safety Code, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 9099-D.) Administrator was informed that failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. An immediate civil penalty of $1,000 repeat violation is assessed today due to being cited for the same violation within 12 months. Administrator was informed that additional civil penalties might be assessed based on Health and Safety Code 1569.49(e) and 1569.49(f). Exit interview conducted, appeal rights discussed, and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.58Type A

    a) The department may prohibit any person from being a licensee...,any employee, prospective employee, or person who is not a client and who has done any of the following: This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted and evidece received the three caregivers and one Med Tech were drinking during their scheduled work shift which poses an immediate personal rights risk to residents in care.

  • 87465(a)(4)Type A

    A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility. The plan shall...provide for assistance in obtaining such care...The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on medication review, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above as medication for R1 was not available as of today and staff was unable to provide documentation that medication was reordered, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87411(a)Type A

    87411(a) Personnel Requirements General (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers... In facilities licensed for sixteen or more, sufficient support staff shall be employed to ensure...This requirement is not met as evidenced by… Based on interviews and record review the Executive Director did not comply with the regulation above by not having sufficient support staff and supervision to perform essential duties for residents in care which poses a potential health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 29, 2025 inspection of AASTA ASSISTED LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of AASTA ASSISTED LIVING on May 29, 2025. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to AASTA ASSISTED LIVING on May 29, 2025?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (1 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "a) The department may prohibit any person from being a licensee...,any employee, prospective employee, or person who is ..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.