Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

LAUREL HEIGHTSLicense 565850243
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

(Report Continued from LIC 9099...) It was alleged that the Administrator is not on the premises for a sufficient number of hours. It was reported that the Administrator is always away from the facility. Interviews conducted with staff revealed that the Administrator is seen coming into the facility everyday Monday through Friday. Staff stated that the Administrator typically comes in the morning and added that the Administrator leaves the facility after they have left for the day themselves. Additionally, during resident interviews it was revealed that six out of six residents often see the Administrator walking through the hallways talking with both residents and staff. Furthermore, interviews with residents and staff corroborated that the Administrator is regularly seen at the facility during normal business hours. Based on the interviews conducted with staff and residents, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to support the allegation of “administrator is not on the premises for a sufficient number of hours”. Therefore, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. It was further alleged that a qualified staff is not designated to operate the facility during the administrator’s absence. It was reported that the facility has designated a receptionist to cover the facility in the Administrator’s absence and they are not qualified. Interviews conducted with staff revealed that the Administrator is regularly at the facility Monday through Friday. However, on weekends when the Administrator is not scheduled, there is management available at the facility. At any time, if the Administrator is unavailable, the facility has a Business Director, Health Services Director, and Marketing Director that are able to assist when needed. Furthermore, interviews conducted with staff revealed that management is available and willing to help whenever the Administrator is not present. Based on the information obtained and reviewed, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to support the allegation of “a qualified staff is not designated to operate the facility during the administrator’s absence”. Therefore, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. No citations issued at this time. A copy of the report was provided.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 16, 2024 inspection of LAUREL HEIGHTS?

This was a complaint inspection of LAUREL HEIGHTS on January 16, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to LAUREL HEIGHTS on January 16, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.