Skip to main content
ReadyRule homepageReadyRule

Inspection visit

complaint

PRIMROSE SCHOOL OF DANVILLELicense 073409581
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Jyoti Saini and Kassandra Medrano arrived unannounced to deliver the findings from a complaint investigation for the above allegation. LPAs met with Licensee Karim Ramzanali and explained the purpose of the inspection. Present during today's visit were the licensee, director and eight (8) staff members supervising 44 children ( 7 toddlers and 37 preschool-aged). Based on the review of records there was no documentation that supports the individual in question lacks the required coursework to meet the qualifications of a fully qualified teacher. Although, the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not perponderance of evidence to prove the alledged allegation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Appeal rights were given. An exit interview was conducted, and the report was reviewed with the Licensee, Karim Ramzanali.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 101212(d)(1)(C)(f)Type B

    101212 Reporting Requirements (d) Upon the occurrence, during the operation of the child care center of any of the events specified in (d)(1) below, a report shall be made to the Department by telephone or fax within the Department's next working day and during its normal business hours. In addition, a written report containing the information specified in (d)(2) below shall be submitted to the Department within seven days following the occurrence of such event.(1) Events reported shall include the following:(C) Any unusual incident or child absence that threatens the physical or emotional health or safety of any child. (f)The items specified in (d)(1)(A) through (H) above shall also be reported to the child's authorized representative.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above, as an incident that occurred at the facility in March 2025 was not reported to the Department nor to the families involved, as required by the rehualtions. This poses a potential risk to the health, safety, and personal rights of the children in care.

    Read full inspector narrative

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 7, 2025 inspection of PRIMROSE SCHOOL OF DANVILLE?

This was a complaint inspection of PRIMROSE SCHOOL OF DANVILLE on July 7, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to PRIMROSE SCHOOL OF DANVILLE on July 7, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.