Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

LITTLE GENIUS ACADEMY OF DANVILLELicense 0734096031 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

S1 stated that C1 was “fine” and at that time, C1 placed the peas in their nose when S1 was not looking. Parents were called and C1 was brought to the doctors to have the peas removed on both occasions. The facility held a staff meeting to go over supervision rules and S1 was terminated. During meal times at least one (1) staff member is to remain at the table with children to ensure full supervision until the last child is done eating. Due to C1 being able to place peas in their nose on two (2) separate occasions due to lack of supervision, LPA determined the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22 is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. A notice of site visit was given and exit interview was conducted with Director Lucy Larson. Due to conflicting information received LPA determined although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A notice of site visit was given and exit interview was conducted with Director Lucy Larson.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • RESPONSIBILITY FOR PROVIDING CARE AND SUPERVISION

    (a) The licensee shall provide care and supervision as necessary to meet the children's needs. (1) No child(ren) shall be left without the supervision of a teacher at any time...Supervision shall include visual observation. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: through interview it was found that C1 placed peas in their nose due to a lack of supervision which posed a potential risk to the health, safety and personal rights of the children in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 23, 2026 inspection of LITTLE GENIUS ACADEMY OF DANVILLE?

This was a complaint inspection of LITTLE GENIUS ACADEMY OF DANVILLE on February 23, 2026. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to LITTLE GENIUS ACADEMY OF DANVILLE on February 23, 2026?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "(a) The licensee shall provide care and supervision as necessary to meet the children's needs. (1) No child(ren) shall b..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.