complaint·July 1, 2024

Due to conflicting information obtained from the interviews, and although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore the above allegation is found to be unsubstantiated. No deficiencies cited. A copy of this report and appeal rights (LIC 9058) was provided to Fregoso. LPA observed Fregoso post LIC9213 – Notice of Site Visit and Fregoso was advised this notice is to be posted for 30 days from today’s date. An exit interview was conducted with Facility Representative, Jessica Fregoso. *** This is an amended version of the report that was created on 7/1/24.*** Based on LPAs interviews which were conducted and records review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met therefore the allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12, Chapter 1, is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. See 9099-C for continuation. 1 Type B deficiency is being cited during today's inspection, see LIC9099D. A copy of this report, notice of site visit (LIC 9213), and appeal rights (LIC 9058) was provided to Fregoso. LPA observed LIC9213 posted. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100. An exit interview was conducted with Facility Representative, Jessica Fregoso.