Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

RUSH 2 LEARNINGLicense 1538084741 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Pursuant to Title 22, Division 12, Chapter 1 of the California Code of Regulations, the following deficiency is cited on LIC 9099-D. An exit interview was conducted, and the report was reviewed with Director Michelle Vanhook. A Notice of Site Visit was issued and must remain posted for 30 consecutive days. Appeal Rights were discussed and issued.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • PERSONAL RIGHTS

    Personal Rights (a) The licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the following personal rights: (1) To be accorded dignity in his/her personal relationships with staff and other persons. This requirement was met as evidenced by: Review of records and observation showed S1 speaking to children in an inappropriate tone and manner. This poses a potential risk to the health, safety, and personal rights of children in care.

  • PERSONAL RIGHTS

    Personal Rights. To be free from corporal or unusual punishment, infliction of pain, humiliation, intimidation, ridicule, coercion, threats, mental abuse, or other actions of a punitive nature. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Record review documented that Staff 1 (S1) physically handled infants in a rough and punitive manner during aggressive time-out placements. Staff 1 (S1) and Staff 2 (S2) failed to console or comfort crying infants, demonstrating a failure to meet infants’ basic care needs. Additionally, S1 placed infants on prolonged time-outs by confining them in highchair-style equipment and similar furniture as a form of discipline or punishment. Although no visible injuries were observed, this conduct posed an immediate risk to infants’ personal rights, health, and well-being.

    Read full inspector narrative

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 20, 2026 inspection of RUSH 2 LEARNING?

This was a complaint inspection of RUSH 2 LEARNING on January 20, 2026. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to RUSH 2 LEARNING on January 20, 2026?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "Personal Rights (a) The licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the following personal rights: (1) To be accor..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.