complaint·April 11, 2024

(Continue from LIC 9099) D1 and L1 denied the allegations. D1 and L1 stated on the alleged dates, staff did not observe any incidents where C1 sustained major injuries. D1 and L1 further stated that C1 was being closely monitored and wellness checks were conducted. D1 claimed that C1 did sustained a minor injury from a fall but did not show signs of distressed. In addition, interviews from D1 and Staff (S1 & S2) indicated that the daycare children are reminded to not run indoors and if misbehaving would use redirection or time out until they calm down. D1 and L1 stated the facility\342\200\231s ratio is not more than 8 children to one staff, with Community Care Licensing requirements being that there shall be a ratio of one teacher visually observing and supervising no more than 12 children in attendance. Statements from D1, L1 and Staff (S1 & S2) indicated when outdoors at least 2 teachers are supervising at opposite ends to ensure every child is being observed. Additionally, S2 stated that the children are never left alone. D1, L1 Staff (S1 & S2) stated the two licenses are divided by age and never commingle. Furthermore D1, L1 and S1 stated when the preschool children are led to the outdoor area by at least 2 staff, the children do go through the Infant license\342\200\231s playground, but is done when the infants are not present. Also, D1 and S1 stated they understand that the facility is licensed for children ages two to six years old but do have children that can appear to be under age requirements. Interviews conducted by parents and children had no concerns with the allegations filed against the facility. It could not be confirmed if C1 sustained major injuries while at the facility. Based on the information gathered during this investigation, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegations occurred and therefore are determined to be unsubstantiated. There were no Title 22 deficiencies cited. This report was reviewed and discussed with the Director, Krystal Gomez. Appeal rights were provided. Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 days from today's visit.