Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Follow-up on corrections

CHILD'S WORLD SCHOOLLicense 1974097024 citations on this visit
4 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Rita Ramos and Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Lilia Hernandez conducted and unannounced complaint inspection to the above facility on 06/27/23. LPM and LPA arrived to the facility at 9:16AM and initially met with Vino Veerasingam, Administrator Assistant, who guided LPA on a tour of the facility. There were 14 children with 9 staff upon arrival. LPM and LPA were later met by Evan Levi, Licensee, Mia Levi, Licensee, and Debrah Heim, Director. The purpose of the visit is to address deficiencies that were discovered during the course of an investigation conducted by the Department. Based on interviews conducted, declarations obtained, records reviewed, pictures taken, and other pertinent information and documentation obtained, it was determined that Staff #1 swaddled Child #1 in an attempt to console Child #1’s “screaming” (crying), then Staff #1 placed Child #1 on a swing, Staff #1 then placed a second blanket over the swing, and Child #1 was left on the swing to sleep for an hour. When Child #1 woke up, Staff #1 changed Child #1's diaper and returned Child #1 to the swing. Per Staff #1, when Child #1 continued to cry, Child #1 was placed in their crib to “cry it out” for 5 to 7 minutes. This poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to children in care. During the course of the investigation, it was also discovered that the facility staff disclosed both verbally and in writing that they were aware that Child #1 showed signs of illness for days. The facility staff continued to accept Child #1 for care at the facility even though they also have an illness policy that indicates that a child will be sent home if they show signs of illness which includes the symptoms that staff observed Child #1 to have. ---Page 1 of 2 When interviewing staff, disclosures were made that Staff #1 and Staff #2 were only provided with resources via email regarding infant safe sleep practices. No information or documentation was provided confirming that staff was provided with on-the-job training on infant safe sleep practices or that the Director and Licensee ensured that staff were following and practicing infant safe sleep. The following deficiencies listed on the attached deficiencies page are being cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations Title 22. A copy of this report shall be provided to the parent/guardian of children currently enrolled by the next business day or immediately upon return. A copy of this report shall also be provided to the parent/guardian of any newly enrolled children for the next 12 months (1 year). The Acknowledgement form must be maintained in each child’s file immediately upon receipt from parent. Licensee/Director was provided with a copy of the parent Acknowledgement of Receipt of Licensing Reports Form during this visit. A copy of the Parent Notification Requirements was also provided to the licensee/Director. The Notice of Site Visit must remain posted for 30 days during the hours of operation after each site visit by a licensing representative. Failure to maintain posting as required will result in a civil penalty of $100.00. Exit interview was conducted with Debrah Heim, Director, including, but not limited to Provider Rights, Appeal Procedures and Agencies Consultative Role. ---Page 2 of 2

Citations

5 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 101216(e)Type B

    101216(e) Personnel Requirements - All personnel shall be given on-the-job training ...and shall be evidenced by safe and effective job performance. This requirement was not met as evidenced by interviews conducted and disclosures made indicating that Staff were provided with only emails regarding infant safe sleep practices which poses a potential health, safety, and personal rights to children in care.

  • PERSONAL RIGHTS

    101223(a)(2) Personal Rights To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment to meet his/her needs.This requirement was not met as evidenced by by interviews conducted and disclosures made indicating that Child #1 was crying, swaddled, placed in a swing, and a blanket was placed over the swing prior to Child #1 falling asleep. When Child #1 woke up crying, Child #1 was placed in the crib to “cry it out” which poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to children in care.

  • 101226.1(a)Type B

    101226.1(a) Daily Inspection for IllnessThe licensee shall be responsible for ensuring that children with obvious symptoms of illnessincluding, but not limited to, fever or vomiting, are not accepted. This requirement was not met as evidenced by interviews conducted, disclosures made,and documentation obtained indicating that staff were aware that Child #1 had symptoms ofillness for days and the facility continued to accept Child #1 for care which poses a potential health and safety risk to children in care.

  • INFANT CARE ACTIVITIES

    101430(a)(3)(E) Infant Care Activities - If an infant falls asleep before being placed in a crib, staff shall move the infant to a crib as soon as possible. This requirement was not met as evidenced by interviews conducted and disclosures made that Child #1 was left on a swing to sleep for an hour which poses a potential health and safety risk to children in care.

  • INFANT CARE ACTIVITIES

    101430(a)(3)(C) Infant Care ActivitiesAn infant shall not be swaddled while in care.This was not met evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted, declarations obtained, records reviewed, pictures taken, and other pertinent information and documentation obtained, it was determined that child #1 was swaddled while in care

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the June 29, 2023 inspection of CHILD'S WORLD SCHOOL?

This was a other inspection of CHILD'S WORLD SCHOOL on June 29, 2023. 4 citations were issued: 1 Type A (serious) and 3 Type B.

Were any citations issued to CHILD'S WORLD SCHOOL on June 29, 2023?

Yes, 4 citations were issued (1 Type A, 3 Type B). The first citation was for: "101216(e) Personnel Requirements - All personnel shall be given on-the-job training ...and shall be evidenced by safe an..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.