Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

CHILD'S WORLD SCHOOLLicense 1974097021 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Per Director, care and supervision is continouslly addressed with staff and continues to ensure care and supervision regulations and guidelines are being followed. Disclosures were made by the director that Staff #3 disclosed that she observed an incident between Staff #10 and Child #1. Staff #3 disclosed to Director that Staff #10 handle Child #1 in a rough manner. Photos of Child #1 were provided and no injury or marks were observed. LPA interviewed Staff #3 who disclosed that while caring for children, Staff #3 observed Staff #10 handle Child #1 in a rough manner when attempting to make Child #1 stay near a table. Staff #10 last day at the facility was 10/14/2024 and is no longer associated. Based on the investigation conducted by the Department which includes interviews, observations, record reviews, and other pertinent information and documents, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. The following deficiencies listed on the attached LIC 809D are being cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations Title 22. A copy of this report, appeal rights, and Notice of Site Visit was provided. The Notice of Site Visit must remain posted for 30 days during the hours of operation after each site visit by a licensing representative. Failure to maintain posting as required will result in a civil penalty of $100.00. Exit interview was conducted with Debbie Heim, Director. ---Page 2 of 2 Per Director, care and supervision is continouslly addressed with staff and continues to ensure care and supervision regulations and guidelines are being followed. LPA conducted interviews with Staff #1 through Staff #9. During the interviews, staff disclosed concerns with Staff #10 and submitted pertinent infoirmation regarding their concerns with Staff #10. However, staff could not confirm observing or witnessing Staff #10 violating the personal rights of children in care. Staff also reported incidences that may have occured in 2023 and 2024 and did not report the incidences to the Department within the required reporting time. LPA also conducted interviews with Parent #1 through Parent #5. During the interviews there was no information provided to support the allegation or verify the information provided in the details of the allegation. Per Director, there were instances where staff reported concerns with Staff #10. Director disclosed that in following up on the concerns, it was disclosed that their was conflict between staff members but was not able to find evidence of children's personal rights being violated. Based on the investigation conducted by LPA, it has been determined that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation are unsubstantiated. The Notice of Site Visit must remain posted for 30 days during the hours of operation after each site visit by a licensing representative. Failure to maintain posting as required will result in a civil penalty of $100.00. A copy of this report, appeal rights, and Notice of Site Visit was provided. Exit interview was conducted with Debbie Heim, Director. --Page 2 of 2

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • PERSONAL RIGHTS

    Personal Rights (a) The licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the following personal rights...(3) To be free from corporal or unusual punishment, infliction of pain, humiliation, intimidation...This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted and information obtained indicating that Staff #3 disclosed that while caring for children, Staff #3 observed Staff #10 handle Child #1 in a rough manner when attempting to make Child #1 stay near a table which posed a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to children in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 11, 2025 inspection of CHILD'S WORLD SCHOOL?

This was a complaint inspection of CHILD'S WORLD SCHOOL on March 11, 2025. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to CHILD'S WORLD SCHOOL on March 11, 2025?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "Personal Rights (a) The licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the following personal rights...(3) To be free..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.