complaint·July 3, 2025

During interviews with the Director and Assistant Director, both stated they were unaware of any injuries involving Child #1. No injury was reported or disclosed to them by staff. During the interview with Staff #1 and Staff #2, the assigned teachers in Classroom 1, both confirmed that Child #1 did not sustain any injuries on 6/12/25. According to the staff, Child #1 did not show any signs of discomfort, and no visible injury was noted before the child went home on 6/12/25. Additionally, nothing was mentioned by the parent at pick-up on that day. Staff #1 and Staff #2 reported that they first became aware of the scratch on the morning of June 13, 2025, when the parent inquired about it. Both staff members denied that the scratch on Child #1\342\200\231s nose occurred at the center and stated that the scratch could have occurred after Child #1 left the facility on June 12. Based on the investigation conducted, there is insufficient evidence to support the above-mentioned allegation to be true. Therefore, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. The Notice of Site Visit was provided and must remain posted for 30 days during the hours of operation after each site visit by a licensing representative. Failure to maintain posting as required will result in a civil penalty of $100.00. Exit interview was conducted with Diane Connell, Director including, but not limited to Provider Rights, Appeal Procedures and Agencies Consultative Role.