complaint·November 17, 2023

LPAs interviewed Parent #1 (P1) who stated that when she arrived to pick up C1, C1 disclosed what had happened. S1 informed P1 that the incident between C1 and C2 had just occurred. Per P1, S2 was in the storage room putting the napping beds away and S1 was picking up the beds. LPAs reviewed the facilities sign in and out sheet for the day the incident occurred and observed the facility to be in ratio compliance. However, the incident occurred and was not observed by any of the staff members. LPAs obtained photos of the classroom. Based on interviews conducted the above allegation is deemed SUBSTANTIATED. The allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence has been met, therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, 101229(a)(1), the deficiency is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. The facility is being cited a Type A deficiency. Upon Receipt, licensee shall post and provide copies of this licensing report and LIC9224 to parents/guardians of children in care at the facility and to parents/guardians of children newly enrolled at the facility during the next 12 months. The Notice of Site Visit was provided. Licensee is advised it must remain posted for 30 days. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report along with Appeal Rights was provided to the Principal, Jorge Reyes.