Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Based on observations made on 09/15/2022 and 07/26/2022, LPA Garc\303\255a observed diaper changing equipment; diaper changing table, mat, changing table paper roll and diaper pail inside the facility. Number of diapers, wipes, and gloves were observed in quantities to meet the needs of children in care. LPA observe diaper changing station and equipment used by Twaddler room staff. In review of records posted on the wall of the diaper changing area, LPA observed diaper changing procedures and Diaper Changing Schedule. Diaper Changing Schedule identifies children\342\200\231s diaper checks; upon arrival and diaper changing times are scheduled throughout the day. LPA Garc\303\255a conducted interviews with Administrator and four (4) day care staff, all staff interviewed denied not meeting child\342\200\231s diapering needs. Staff statements concur that diapers are changed on schedules times however, diapers are checked frequently and changed as often as necessary. In addition, LPA interview three (3) former day care parents of children who attended the Twaddler room and required diaper changes. Although, interviews with staff and parents revealed the facility was meeting the diapering needs of the children in care and had not had experiences with children having diaper rashes, the complainant refused to provide contact information or a specific time frame of when allegation occurred, based on the interviews conducted, at this time there is not enough evidence to support the above allegation. Report continues on next page 2 of 3. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that a few years ago staff was not meeting daycare child\342\200\231s diapering needs causing a diaper rash. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid; Based on interviews conducted; there were no witness to the allegation and the complainant in questioned refused to provide contact and time frame information, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore at this time the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. Should additional information become available in the future, this investigation may be reopened. A n otice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with Licensee representative, Administrator, Suk \342\200\234Mandy\342\200\235 Seto. Report ends here page 3 of 3.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • TEACHER-CHILD RATIO

    101216.3 Teacher-Child Ratio: (a) There shall be a ratio of one teacher visually observing and supervising no more than 12 children in attendance, except as specified in (b) and (c) below. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: LPA’s interview disclosure confirmed by staff that incident took place years ago where Staff #3 was left with 13-15 children alone in the classroom providing the care and supervision of children in care. This poses a potential health and safety risk to children in care

  • 101227(a)Type B

    101227-Food Services:(a)In child care centers providing meals to children, the following shall apply: (1) All food shall be safe and of the quality and in the quantity necessary to meet the needs of the children..... All food shall be selected, stored, prepared and served in a safe and healthful manner. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA's observations made on 07/26/2022- expired food; flour tortillas with a best before date of 07/20/22, cream cheese with a best when used by date of 06/21/22, butter with an expiration of 11/29/19, Frozen chicken/cheese taquitos with a best by date of 3/13/22. This poses a potential health and safety risk to children in care.

  • 101227(2)Type B

    101227-Food Services: (2) The minimum amounts of food components to be served as lunch or supper as set forth in paragraph (a)(2) of ...[7 CFR, Part 226.20, Revised January 1, 1990] are as follows: Milk fluid age 3 through 5= ¾ cups. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations made on 07/26/2022, LPA García observed that the facility uses 3-ounce cups to serve preschool age children milk and the facility did not have a reserve of milk in quantities to meet the needs of children in care. This poses a potential health and safety risk to children in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 15, 2022 inspection of KIDDY TYME CHILD CARE/LEARNING CENTER?

This was a complaint inspection of KIDDY TYME CHILD CARE/LEARNING CENTER on September 15, 2022. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to KIDDY TYME CHILD CARE/LEARNING CENTER on September 15, 2022?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.