Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

The Director stated that Staff#1 was let go due to not getting along with any of the other staff members working at the facility.The Director stated that Staff#1 would have a hard time performing certain tasks such as taking too long to change and clean up the classroom for the next activity. The Director also stated that the incident involving Staff#1 leaving child in care alone in the hallway did not happen and it was misunderstanding that was caused by Staff#1 not getting along with the other staff members. During an interview, Staff#3 confirmed that the incident in the hallway was a misunderstanding since they (Staff#3) was with staff#1 counting the children before going outside. There was 1 child that was walking towards the rest of the group in the hallway. The child that was lagging was observed by another staff member (Staff#4) and made a remark that implied that the child that was walking was left alone by Staff#1. Staff#3 stated that they informed Staff#4 that the child was not left alone and was just walking to join the rest of the children waiting by the front entrance to go outside. While Staff#1 was let go on 12/21/2023 it is not clear if the incident's specified by the complaint did occur. Interviews conducted with currently employed staff members did not produce any evidence that supported or went against the specific allegation. The Director stated that children in the preschool are capped at 12 children per classroom so even if Staff#1 took too long during a break, the ratio and supervision would not have been effected. Based on the evidence collected during the investigation, the allegations that Staff do not properly supervise children in care may be valid. However, there is not enough preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore at this time the above allegation is found to be unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted with Director Megha Sahni. Appeal rights discussed and explained. The notice of site inspection must remain posted for a period of 30 days during hours of operation. Failure to maintain posting will result in a civil penalty of $100.00 dollars.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 11, 2024 inspection of BLOSSOM GARDEN LEARNING ACADEMY?

This was a complaint inspection of BLOSSOM GARDEN LEARNING ACADEMY on January 11, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to BLOSSOM GARDEN LEARNING ACADEMY on January 11, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.