Inspector’s narrative
What the inspector wrote
The investigation revealed that multiple children had come into contact with cat feces while playing on the playground. In one instance, child #1 soiled their shirt on or about 08/20/2025. Staff changed the child’s shirt, bagged the soiled clothing, and provided a note to the parent at pickup explaining the incident. During inspections, LPA directly observed cat feces in the playground area. Staff confirmed that they rotate cleaning duties due to stray cats entering the playground.
Staff #1 provided documentation showing that the facility had taken active steps to address these concerns. On 08/28/2025, the facility provided an order summary referencing a cobweb duster with an extension pole, a washable cleaning duster kit with two duster heads, a cobweb duster, a corner brush, a 15–100 inch aluminum telescoping pole, and a two-piece “Watch Your Step” sign with a metal stake measuring 12 inches by 9 inches in corrugated plastic. These items were intended to alert children, staff, and the public to tripping hazards. Another invoice dated 08/28/2025 indicated that a motion-activated sprinkler designed to deter animals such as cats, birds, and dogs was anticipated for delivery the following day. Additionally, an upgraded 2025 solar-powered ultrasonic animal repeller for outdoor use with a motion sensor was expected to arrive on 08/29/2025. A previous invoice dated 08/09/2025 documented that cat repellent granules to deter rabbits, dogs, and cats were delivered on 08/11/2025.
These actions demonstrate the facility’s proactive efforts to maintain compliance with California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12, Chapter 1, and to regularly clean and monitor the playground area for animal feces.
On 09/08/2025, LPA did not observe cat feces on the playground. A trash receptacle within the playground had a new liner without fecal matter. LPA reviewed the Playground Maintenance Schedule, which showed the staff responsible for ensuring the playground remains clean and free of animal feces. LPA also confirmed that motion detectors on the playground were working and activated with sound when triggered.
Regarding the walkway to the playground, LPA observed that the cement pathway had been filled and leveled to address a tripping hazard near a tree root system. LPA walked the pathway and observed that the surface was smooth and no longer presented a hazard. Staff #1 stated the work was completed by a volunteer on 09/06/2025.
LPA acknowledges the facility’s corrective actions and cooperation to support the health and safety of children in care. Citations are still being issued because the complaint allegations were substantiated through interviews, record review, and prior LPA observations. (Continued on LIC9099-C)
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the allegation that staff does not ensure the playground area is free of animal feces is substantiated. This poses a potential risk to children in care and is cited as a Type B violation.
Regarding the allegation that staff does not ensure outdoor pavement is in good repair, LPA observed uneven cement surfaces and holes along the pathway leading to the playground. Tree roots had lifted sections of the pavement, creating tripping hazards. Staff and children regularly use this pathway to access the playground. Staff #1 confirmed that bright orange paint had been applied to highlight the hazard, and “Watch Your Step” signs were ordered to provide additional alert. However, the walkway remained uneven and required repair to mitigate the risk. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the allegation that staff does not ensure outdoor pavement is in good repair is substantiated. This condition posed a potential health and safety risk to children in care and is cited as a Type B violation.
Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12, Chapter 1, these deficiencies are cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
An exit interview was conducted with Staff #1. A copy of this report and Appeal Rights were provided and discussed. An LIC 9213 (Notice of Site Visit) was issued, and Staff #1 was instructed that it must be posted for 30 days. (End of Report)
Conflicting interview statements were obtained. Some individuals reported observing insects, while others acknowledged that occasional pest activity may occur due to the facility’s location in a town surrounded by fields. However, none of the statements indicated an active infestation. Record review of a representative sample of children’s files did not reveal patterns of insect-related concerns or health issues.
LPA reviewed a pest service invoice dated 08/09/2025, which confirmed that the facility receives regular pest control services. The invoice documented that the provider removed webs, treated the exterior perimeter of the church and school, and applied a liquid barrier to reduce crawling pest activity. The invoice referenced the facility’s address on file with Child Care Licensing, verifying that the service was provided at OLM Church & School. Additionally, statements indicated that the local mosquito abatement agency has provided services to reduce mosquito activity in the area.
Staff #1 provided order summary documentation showing additional steps the facility has taken to support keeping the facility free of insects. On 08/28/2025, the facility ordered a cobweb duster with extension pole, a washable cleaning duster kit with two duster heads, a cobweb duster, a corner brush, and a 15–100 inch aluminum telescoping pole. These items were intended to assist staff with reaching high or hard-to-access areas for cleaning and pest prevention. While these orders demonstrate the facility’s efforts, LPA explained during the inspection that, although supportive of a pest-free environment, the available information did not confirm whether all prior measures fully prevented insect activity.
During the inspections, LPA did not observe an active infestation. In a consultative manner, LPA advised facility staff to continue working with their pest control provider and communicate specific concerns to ensure ongoing monitoring and treatment.
This agency has determined that the allegation is unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12, Chapter 1, no deficiencies were cited. An exit interview was conducted with Staff #1. A copy of this report and Appeal Rights were provided and discussed with Staff #1. An LIC 9213 (Notice of Site Visit) was issued, and LPA instructed Staff #1 that the LIC 9213 must remain posted for 30 days. (End of Report)
