Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Furthermore, Site Supervisor noted that all children are to be always doing an activity, if teacher is busy with a group of children, then they rotate the children’s groups. All staff (S1-S4) reported that children are redirected to other activities if they are not listening and provided with a time to relax and calm down. Site Supervisor reported that there was an incident in which Child (C1) was waiting for parent to pick up and ran through the classroom glass door that leads directly to center main entrance. Site Supervisor added that S2 called out C1’s name since S2 did not see parent coming through the main door. S2 recalled incident in which C1 got up and started running and S2 thought that C1 was going to run out. S2 reported saying to C1 “No, no wait don’t leave” because S2 though that C1 was going to leave. S2 reported that it was an instant reaction, to being scared and thinking C1 was leaving. S3 recalled incident in which C1 saw parent, got excited and started running. S3, heard S2 say to C1 “Hey, don’t leave” because S2 was scared that C1 was going to run out to the street. S3 stated that S2 did not yell at C1 but wanted to stop C1 from running out to the street. S4 stated that S2’s voice can be loud but would not be interpreted as scary or yelling. S3 reported raising their tone of voice sometimes when a child is going to fall, bite another child, run to the playground, or run towards the door outside, to prevent accidents. Children interviews (C1-C7) did not corroborate allegations and there were no reports of yelling or being excluded from participating in daycare activities. C1, stated “I did not hear yelling or screaming”. C2-C7 all reported feeling safe at the daycare center. In addition, parent statements (P1, P2, P4, P5) did not present any concerns about staff yelling or preventing children from participating in daycare activities and did not corroborate the allegations. Based on the information gathered during this investigation, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegations occurred and therefore are determined to be unsubstantiated. There were no Title 22 deficiencies cited. This report was reviewed and discussed with Site Supervisor, Evelyn Fuentes. Appeal rights were provided. Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 days from today's visit.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 12, 2024 inspection of CANV KIDS DEVELOPMENT & FAMILY PROGRAM AKA LOS NIN?

This was a complaint inspection of CANV KIDS DEVELOPMENT & FAMILY PROGRAM AKA LOS NIN on December 12, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to CANV KIDS DEVELOPMENT & FAMILY PROGRAM AKA LOS NIN on December 12, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.