Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Non-compliance follow-up

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

(Page 1) Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Giselle Lucero conducted a Case Management Inspection to ensure the facility is staying within compliance of Title 22 regulations. LPA observed 27 preschool children in care with 5 staff members providing care and supervision. During the inspection it was determined the facility is operating within its licensed capacity and within compliance of staffing ratios. A review of the Facility Personnel Report Summary on this date indicates all facility staff or other individuals who require caregiver background checks have received criminal record and child abuse index clearances or exemptions. On 4/21/2023 a self-reported Unusual Incident Report (UIR) was filed with the Licensing Office. The facility reported a child walked out of the lower play yard and walked past staff that was assisting a parent during sign out. Child was then observed sitting alone on a ramp which is located in front of room #2. LPA Lucero conducted this inspection to review facility\342\200\231s procedures to ensure facility is providing care and supervision to children in care. LPA observed name to face logs on the Bright wheel app and white boards that are placed in classrooms and play yard for staff to write how many children are present in the classrooms and in the play yard. Facility uses Bright Wheel app where parents sign child in/out, as well as staff. The Bright Wheel App indicates and totals how many children are present, how many children have been signed out, and how many children are absent. A n interview with Director Marietta Gilliard was conducted. Director stated child ratio counts are recorded on care and supervision board inside the classroom and in each yard outdoors. During arrival and departure times, counts are conducted as children enter for the day and exit at the end of the day. Staff confirm total of number of children in attendance and communicate verbally using walkie talkies informing one another which child moved or has been picked up and signed out. (continue to page 2) (Page 2) In the areas that were evaluated, NO deficiencies were observed of the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12 at the time of the visit. The Notice of Site Visit was posted. Director was informed that the Notice of Site Visit must be posted for 30 consecutive days. Failure to post will result in civil penalties of $100. The Center Manager was provided a copy of their Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 01/16) and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. Center Manager was informed all appeals must be in writing and received by the Licensing office within 15 business days. End of Report.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • ARTICLE 3. Administration

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. The facility could not provide a copy of the completed lead testing and LPA did not observe lead testing completed on the waterboard website. This poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 19, 2024 inspection of FULLERTON COLLEGE CHILD DEVELOPMENT LABORATORY SCH?

This was an other inspection of FULLERTON COLLEGE CHILD DEVELOPMENT LABORATORY SCH on April 19, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to FULLERTON COLLEGE CHILD DEVELOPMENT LABORATORY SCH on April 19, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was an other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.