Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

CHILDTIME LEARNING CENTERLicense 300610695
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

***page 2*** Staff added that all the children were being closely supervised during the outside play time. Staff #3 (S3) reports hearing Child#1 (C1) who was playing nearby, start to cry. S3 states they then proceeded to approach the child to assess the need and guided child away from the sand area to be seated on the bench. While guiding C1, S3 reports noticing blood on the front of C1’s pants. Orange County social worker reported that Child Protective Services (CPS) investigated and findings were unfounded for any suspected abuse. Social worker added that medical professionals could not determine the cause of the child’s bleeding, however there was no indication of any breaking of the skin or entry to the body consistent with abuse. C1 who was involved in the incident, and other children from the classroom, who were identified as being outside during the time of the allege incident were not qualified to be interviewed due to developmental level. Parent of C1 reported it was unknown what caused the incident with C1 and added that there were no symptoms determined by the medical professionals that indicated trauma or anything inappropriate occurred. Other parents interviewed were satisfied with the care and supervision children received and had no concerns. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging a lack of supervision resulting in injury to child. We have found that the complaint was unsubstantiated. While the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Exit interview was conducted with director. The Notice of Site Visit was posted. Facility representative was informed that the Notice of Site Visit must be posted for 30 consecutive days. Failure to post will result in civil penalties of $100. Appeal Rights explained. A copy of their appeal rights (LIC 9058) was given and signatures on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. All appeals must be in writing and received by the licensing office within 15 business days. The first level appeal is to regional manager; address is above on the report.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the June 22, 2021 inspection of CHILDTIME LEARNING CENTER?

This was a complaint inspection of CHILDTIME LEARNING CENTER on June 22, 2021. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to CHILDTIME LEARNING CENTER on June 22, 2021?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.