Complaint·April 30, 2026

During the course of investigation, LPA toured the facility, conducted interviews with 6 staff members and 4 parents , and obtained facility roster. LPA interviewed 6 staff members. 4 out of 6 staff members stated they witnessed staff interrupting the daycare children while napping. Staff #3 (S3) stated they observed Staff #1(S1) moving a crib from one room to the other. S3 stated, children should be sleeping without being interrupted and moving their crib is interrupting their sleep. S1 stated, staff did not intentionally disrupt sleeping infants, they woke up because of the noise in the other room and the movement, but staff didn't intentionally try to wake the infants up. Facility has stopped moving them while they are sleeping in their crib. LPA Duron did not interview children due to their age and being non-verbal. LPA Duron interviewed 4 parents. All interviewed parents stated they did not have any concern with facility. Based on LPA’s interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations have been found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12, Chapter 1 Section 101223(a)(3) Personal Rights 9099D: This requirement is met as evidence by: Based on interviews, 4 out of 6 staff members stated they witnessed staff interrupting the daycare children while napping. Staff #3 (S3) stated they observed S1 moving a crib from one room to the other. S3 stated, children should be sleeping without being interrupted and moving their crib is interrupting their sleep, which poses a potential health and safety risk to the children in care. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the facility representative Loretta Munoz. Page 2 of 2. End of Report.