Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

WOLFF WATERLicense 334845437
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

LPA conducted an internal (at the facility) record review of recent incidents involving bites at the facility and found (4) incidents involving Child One (C1) being the one who had bitten children. The dates were as follows: 4/3/2025, 4/7/2025, 4/16/2025, and 4/17/2025. LPA reviewed Child to Teacher ratio records and found that on 4/3/2025, there were 14 children (at max) to 4 teachers that day. On 4/7/2025, there were 15 children (at max) to 4 teachers. On 4/16/2025, there were 11 children to 3 teachers, and on 4/17/2025 there were 13 children to 3 teachers. LPA then interviewed Staff One (S1), Staff Two (S2), Staff Three (S3), and Staff Four (S4). S2, S3, and S4 are assigned to the Toddler area. 3 of 3 staff who are assigned to the area all concluded that their ratios are always met, and if the area will be short staffed, other facility sites are relied upon to provide coverage to maintain supervision of children. On 4/16/2025, S4 stated they were near C1 and C3, and upon hearing the commotion, S4 turned around, to see C3 with teary eyes. S4 engaged the situation, and found that C3 had been bitten by C1. S4 redirected C1 with a book, and explained to them that hurting their friends is not appropriate. On 4/17/2025, S3 was in the area and although did not directly witness the incident, was assigned to the room with S2, S3, and S4. S1 feels that C1 began displaying biting behaviors after they had new teachers come in to replace teachers who were no longer employed on or near 04/01/2025. S1 plans to meet with C1's parent on 4/24/2025 to discuss a behavioral plan moving forward in an attempt to divert any further incident of biting other children. S1 explained that parents are notified either through a communication system called Learning Genie, if they cannot be reach via telephone call after an incident occurs involving their children. If still not reached, they'll talk to parents when they pick up their child. LPA attempted an interview with C1, but was unsuccessful at reaching anything relevant to the investigation. LPA observed camera footage inside the Toddler Room on 04/16/2025, and found 3 teachers and 11 children. LPA observed C1 participating in a water activity with a teacher and several other children. LPA could not exactly identify the incident; however, ratio of 3:11 paralleled the facility's records. LPA then observed camera footage on 4/17/2025; and although could not locate the exact incident, LPA observed 3 teachers with approximately 6 children in the area of the alleged time-frame. This was also confirmed via record review. Thus, due to record review and interviews conducted, the Department found the allegation Unsubstantiated. A finding of Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. LPA concluded today's investigation with noting staffing levels are 17 preschool children to 4 teachers, and 7 Toddlers to 3 teachers. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was reviewed with and provided to Child Development Specialist Lizeth Ouellette along with copies of the LIC9099C, LIC811 (confidential names list), LIC859, and Appeal Rights. Director Margie Sanchez was on-site, and approved Child Development Specialist Lizeth Ouellette to sign the report.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 101212(d)(1)(c)Type B

    Reporting Requirements: (d) Upon the occurrence, during the operation of the child care center of any of the events specified in (d)(1) below, a report shall be made to the Department by telephone or fax within the Department's next working day and during its normal business hours. In addition, a written report containing the information specified in (d)(2) below shall be submitted to the Department within seven days following the occurrence of such event.(1) Events reported shall include the following:(C) Any unusual incident or child absence that threatens the physical or emotional health or safety of any child. This requirement was not being met as evidencee by: Based on the mentioned complaint investigation concluding that C1 had bitten several children in care, the incidents should have been reported to CCL. This is a potential health and safety and/or personal rights risk to children in care.

    Read full inspector narrative

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 23, 2025 inspection of WOLFF WATER?

This was a complaint inspection of WOLFF WATER on April 23, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to WOLFF WATER on April 23, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.