Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Incident investigation

PSD/ONTARIO HEAD STARTLicense 364801214
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

A case management visit is being conducted in response to the receipt of an unusual incident report (UIR) from the facility. LPAs met with Director, William Alvarez. The center was toured, and a census was taken. The UIR was received by the licensing agency, and it indicates a child’s fingers were stuck in a door in Classroom N.95. Facility records were reviewed, and interviews were conducted with Site Director and pertinent parties. Per information obtain during this inspection, Staff N.1 and Staff N.2 were providing care and supervision to 6 children in the classroom. At the time of the incident, Staff N.2 was setting tables for lunchtime, and Staff N.1 was dancing and singing with children. Staff N.1 noticed that Child N.1 was by the door squatting, and it was assumed that the child was going to the restroom and did not want to disturb the child. Few seconds later, Child N.1 cried and scream “ow.” Staff N.1 immediately stopped and check on the child. As Staff N.1 approached Child N.1 it was observed that child’s finger was stuck under the front classroom door (opening was approximately 1/2 inch gap). Staff N.1 pushed the door open and released the child’s finger. Child’s middle finger (left hand) was swollen, red, bleeding and some skin peeled off. Staff comforted child, cleaned the cut and applied ice. Child’s Authorized Representative (AR) was called immediately and arrived at the facility within 30 minutes. Staff advised AR to take child to the doctor to rule out any concerns. Child N.1 in non-verbal due to age. Therefore, LPA Ruiz called the AR of the child and information provided by child’s AR confirm that child returned to the facility the following day and child is doing well. Child was taken to Urgent Care on the day of the incident but parent decided not to seek medical attention. It was stated the child had a scrap and the facility informed her of the incident and spoke with her to make sure the child was doing well. During this inspection, LPAs observed Classroom N.95 where the incident took place and the adjacent classroom which is currently used as an office; both doors had a door guard( door skirt/ door sweep) to prevent future incident from occurring. Based on information gathered, LPA was able to determine that an incident did occur; however, facility acted appropriately by providing First Aid, reporting the incident to the parent and Community Care Licensing as soon as it happened. Facility also took immediate action by installing door guards to prevent future incidents. Facility also maintained close communication with parent and follow up regarding child’s health condition. Child is still enrolled at the facility. There appears to be no violation of Title 22 Regulation pertaining to the reported incident at this time. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with Director, William Alvarez. Appeal rights were discussed, and a notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • TEACHER QUALIFICATIONS AND DUTIES

    b) Prior to employment, a teacher shall meet the requirements of (b)(1) or (b)(2) below: (1) A teacher shall have completed,...at least six post-secondary semester or equivalent quarter units of the...requirement specified...below, or shall have obtained a Child Development Assistance Permit...This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Per interviews conducted and staff own admission, it was confirmed that Staff N.1 was observed working in a classroom as a lead teacher providing care and supervision. However, staff records revealed that Staff N.1 has college credits; however, courses in transcripts do not qualify Staff N.1 to work as a qualified Lead Teacher.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 6, 2023 inspection of PSD/ONTARIO HEAD START?

This was a other inspection of PSD/ONTARIO HEAD START on April 6, 2023. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to PSD/ONTARIO HEAD START on April 6, 2023?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.