complaint·August 11, 2021

Based upon the information gathered, there is not a preponderance of evidence to support or dismiss the allegation. The above allegation is ruled unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview was conducted with director Alisa Holtegarrd. Notice of Site Visit was issued and must be posted for 30 days. A copy of this report was provided to the facility. This report must be made available at the facility for 3 years for public review upon request. California Code of Regulations Title 22, Division 12, Section 101229(a)(1) requires no child(ren) be left without the supervision, including visual observation, of a teacher at any time. Based on the information obtained, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. The allegation is therefore substantiated. See LIC9099D for deficiencies cited per California Code of Regulations Title 22, Division 12. An exit interview was conducted with Ms. Holtegarrd. Appeal rights discussed, Notice of Site Visit was issued and must be posted for 30 days. A copy of this report was provided to the facility. Ms. Holtegarrd was provided with a copy of the appeal rights (LIC9058 12/2015) and her signature on this report acknowledges receipt of those rights. A COPY OF ALL TYPE A DEFICIENCIES (LIC9099D) CITED DURING THIS INSPECTION MUST BE POSTED FOR 30 DAYS. A COPY OF ALL TYPE A DEFICIENCIES CITED DURING THIS INSPECTION MUST ALSO BE IMMEDIATELY (within 24 hours of the child’s next day in care) GIVEN TO THE PARENTS OF ALL CHILDREN ENROLLED IN THE CHILD CARE FACILITY AND ANY CHILDREN ENROLLED INTO THE CHILD CARE FACILITY OVER THE NEXT 12 MONTHS. This report must be made available at the facility for 3 years for public review upon request.