Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

DOT TO DOTLicense 376701138
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

licensee stated that the playground area is cleaned weekly, and that playground mulch and sand are replaced annually each December. The licensee provided a compliance certificate from December 2024 for “playfiber,” as a well a vendor’s invoice for playground service. Parents interviewed did not express concern with the safety of the outdoor play areas. The RP did not provide any visual evidence to support the allegations, and in interviews, acknowledged uncertainty if the playground surface was safe or not safe. The licensee reported to CCLD on January 13 that the center director had resigned and that a search for a new director would commence. In the absence of a permanent director, the licensee installed Erica Castaneda, the director from the licensee’s other child care center, to be the interim director present at the facility. In the event of their absence, fully qualified teachers and/or the licensee were present as substitutes. The RP stated a designated substitute was not present – specifically, afternoons from 2-5 pm – but also, that the facility’s “The Core Team,” which consists of qualified staff was present. Staff interviewed conveyed that either the interim director or a staff lead was present in the afternoon to greet parents. During a visit to the facility, LPA observed the presence of both, at the hours the violation alleges. LPA has determined that the licensee arranged for fully qualified staff to be in place during operating hours. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the above allegations cannot be proven or disproven. Therefore, they are considered UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with Hillary Clark, lead teacher. Notice of Site Visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100. Appeal rights provided.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 2, 2025 inspection of DOT TO DOT?

This was a complaint inspection of DOT TO DOT on April 2, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to DOT TO DOT on April 2, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.