complaint·October 29, 2025

Based on the evidence obtained, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the allegation that the licensee failed to report an unusual incident to the Department is SUBSTANTIATED. A closing interview was conducted with Licensee. A deficiency was cited on the LIC 9099-D under the same section. Licensee was provided and advised of Appeal Rights (LIC 9058). A copy of this report was reviewed and provided to the Licensee. LPA explained the facility's required plan of correction (POC). Licensee's signature at the bottom of this report acknowledges Licensee received the reports and understand their rights. The Notice of Site Visit was also provided to the Licensee as required by H&S Code Section 1596.817. The Notice of Site Visit must remain posted for 30 days or a civil penalty of $100.00 may apply. Interviews, inspections and documents reviewed did not corroborate the allegation noted above. Although the allegation may have been made with merit, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore, the allegation listed above is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee, Maribel Aguilar. Licensee was provided with Appeal Rights (LIC 9058) and a Notice of Site Visit (LIC 9213). Notice of Site Visit must be posted for 30 days or a civil penalty of $100 may apply.