complaint·February 5, 2025

Six staff (S1 - S6) were interviewed on 11/4/24 and 1/16/25 and S3 confirmed the allegation that Staff left day care child in soiled diaper resulting in a diaper rash, stating that S3 did observe C1 left in full diaper a few times, and that C1 did have a diaper rash. S1 - S2 and S4 - S6 denied the allegation stating that no children including C1 were ever left in soiled diapers that resulted in a diaper rash and that diapers are changed every 2 hours and as needed. S1 - S2 and S4 - S6 also stated that children at the facility have gotten diapers rashes but not from being left in soiled diapers, and that staff monitor the diaper rashes closely. Five parents were interviewed on 1/9/25 and 1/15/25 and had no knowledge of C1's diapering needs not being met. P1 - P5 stated that their Children's' diapering needs are being met while in care and that the facility provides parents with a diaper changing log. During today's inspection, the facility was toured, and LPA Sydney Sims observed 14 children in care. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, and the findings are unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the assistant Director Theresa Eisen. Appeal rights were provided. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100.