Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

KINDERCARE LEARNING CENTERLicense 4830018372 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Multiple individuals interviewed stated that at times there have been unexplained child injuries while in care and that those incidents are not being reported to the child’s authorize representative. Staff interviews revealed that unexplained injuries occur during transition periods. That there have been occasions in which parents have not been given an incident report because the teacher that observed the incident already left facility for the day. Photographic evidence obtained during the investigation confirmed that unexplained injuries are happening due to staff not actively supervising children and being distracted on cellphones thus not noticing child incidents that occur. The allegations infant sustained unexplained injuries in care and staff did not report incident(s) to day care children authorized representative which is a violation of care and supervision, and observation of child are substantiated. Based on interviews and additional evidence obtained the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegations are found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22), is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Appeal rights were provided. Exit interview conducted, and report was reviewed with Center Director, Justice Willis. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100. Staff and parents interviewed stated that classrooms are cleaned and sanitized on regular basis. Although, two individuals interviewed reported observing that the sanitation process for the classrooms is not being followed correctly by some staff. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, therefore the allegation was unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the facility representative, Justice Willis. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Appeal Rights were provided. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • PERSONAL RIGHTS

    101223 Personal Rights (a) The licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the following personal rights: (1) To be accorded dignity in his/her personal relationships with staff and other persons.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on evidence received in which two staff are having an argument, yelling derogatory terms while children are present, which poses a potential Health, Safety and Personal Rights risk to children in care.

  • OBSERVATION OF THE CHILD

    101226.3 Observation of the Child (b)Any unusual behavior, any injury or signs of illness requiring assessment and/or administration of first aid by staff shall be reported to the child's authorized representative and recorded in the child's record. This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on interviews that staff are not reporting incidents that occur to parents or child's authorize representative,which poses a potential Health, Safety and Personal Rights risk to children in care.

  • RESPONSIBILITY FOR PROVIDING CARE AND SUPERVISION FOR INFANTS

    101429 Responsibility for Providing Care and Supervision for Infants (a)In addition to Section 101229, the following shall apply:(1)Each infant shall be constantly supervised and under direct visual observation and supervision by a staff person at all times. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and photographic evidence that staff are not actively supervising children due to being on their cellphone, which poses a potential Health, Safety and Personal Rights risk to children in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 15, 2025 inspection of KINDERCARE LEARNING CENTER?

This was a complaint inspection of KINDERCARE LEARNING CENTER on April 15, 2025. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to KINDERCARE LEARNING CENTER on April 15, 2025?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (0 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "101223 Personal Rights (a) The licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the following personal rights: (1) To b..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.