Skip to main content
ReadyRule homepageReadyRule

Inspection visit

complaint

SHINING STARS PRESCHOOL & INFANT CENTERLicense 566214036
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

A picture was taken of the child showing the rash on his face. No follow-up to the rash was completed on the part of the staff. Substantiated – “Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division & Chapter number). An advisory note was given advising center staff to assure that the all enrollment documentation is completed and reviewed before child begins attending center. The documentation that is completed for possible food allergies is shared with all the staff that works with children with an allergy. Exit interview conducted with Director, Armida Luevano. A copy of the Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 FAS 01/16) were given and explained. Director’s signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. The Notice of SITE VISIT MUST REMAIN POSTED FOR 30 DAYS OR A CIVIL PENALTY OF $100.00 WILL APPLY. THE NOTICE OF SITE VISIT WAS POSTED AS REQUIRED BY H&S CODE SEC. 1596.817

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 101212(d)(1)(B)Type B

    REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

    101212(d)(1)((B) Any injury to any child that requires medical treatment.))-Reporting Requirements -Upon the occurrence, during the operation of the child care center...within seven days following the occurrence of such event.(1) Events reported shall include the following: (B)Any injury to any child that requires medical treatment. C1 was not provided a safe and healthful environment. C1 developed a rash on his face, and the staff failed to investigate the cause of the rash. There was no evidence of any follow-up from staff as to the cause of the rash.

  • 101439(c)Type B

    101439(c) Infant Care Center Fixtures, Furniture, Equipment and Supplies- (c) A "baby walker" means any article described in paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 1500.86 of Part 1500 of Title 16 of the Code of Federal Regulations.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: LPA observed and took pictures of 2 infant saucer chairs in the infant classroom.

  • 102425(f)Type A

    INFANT SAFE SLEEP

    Infant Safe Sleep-102425 (f) An infant shall not be swaddled while in care.This requirement was not met as evidenced by:A picture submitted in complaint showing an infant swaddled in an infant seat.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 10, 2023 inspection of SHINING STARS PRESCHOOL & INFANT CENTER?

This was a complaint inspection of SHINING STARS PRESCHOOL & INFANT CENTER on February 10, 2023. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to SHINING STARS PRESCHOOL & INFANT CENTER on February 10, 2023?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.