Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

FERNANDO, RASIKA & FERNANDO, THARINDULicense 3043135491 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

During the course of investigation, LPA reviewed 4 staff files and 5 children’s files, obtained a Children’s Roster, LPA also interviewed 4 staff members, 2 children and 3 parents. During the staff interviews, staff #1 (S1) stated the facility is a clean and safe environment for children. S1 said the other day a parent went through an off-limit area and there are items in the hallway but now there is child safety gate to prevent entrance into the off-limit area. S1 does not have any concerns that the home is too cluttered because it’s in the off-limit areas and in the childcare it’s not cluttered, it’s Montessori based so there is a section for the concepts, it requires a lot of stuff. Staff #2 (S2) stated the facility is clean and safe environment for children, except the construction area in the backyard. No one is allowed back there right now. S2 denied having concerns for the most part, and that the facility is not too cluttered for the children in care. S2 stated the assistants clean the daycare areas daily and the two licensees clean the off-limit areas not as often, not daily. S2 thinks the home is clean and free of clutter. Staff 3 (S3) stated the home is a clean and safe environment for children but also stated the home is a little bit cluttered. S3 stated, S1, S4 and S3 clean the facility and they clean it every day. S3 denied that the home is too cluttered. When asked if S3 thinks the facility is clean, tidy, and free of clutter S3 stated, “yes, the daycare areas.” S3 disclosed concern for an off-limit area, S3 pointed to living/dining room area and items, “I’m scared of this area but we always grab their (children’s hands) when walking through this area”. Staff #4 (S4) stated the home is a clean and safe environment for children and denied that it’s too cluttered. The facility is cleaned every day by S1, S3 and S4. When asked if there were any areas of concern in regard to too much clutter or cleanliness, S4 stated the living room and dining room. The daycare areas are clean, tidy and free of clutter. LPA Valdez Santana contacted 6 parents for an interview and was able to interview 3 parents. 1 of 3 parents, stated concerns over the amount of clutter in the home. It’s a business also so it should not have so much clutter everywhere. Child #1 (C1) stated the facility is clean. When asked if there are too many things/items in the home, C1 said, “yes, her house is messy”. Child #2 (C2) stated the licensee “has too much stuff”. While conducting the investigation, LPA conducted a thorough inspection of the daycare areas including off-limit areas. LPA took various pictures of the facility showing clutter in areas that although are off-limit areas, children still have access to and have to walk through in order to access daycare areas. Pictures depict tools, construction equipment, bags of clothes, boxes, piles of papers and other miscellaneous items. Page 2 of 3. Based on LPA’s observations, interviews conducted, it was determined that Licensee does not ensure that the home is clean, sanitary, or free from clutter. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore the above allegation s is found to be SUBSTANTIATED . California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12, Chapter 1 Section 102417(b) Operation of a Family Child Care Home: Type B is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. This is a repeat violation. Civil Penalty was assessed. Please refer to attached 9099D for documentation of deficiencies. Exit interview was conducted. The Notice of Site Visit was posted. Appeal Rights was explained. A copy of appeal rights (LIC 9058 1/16) was provided and their signatures on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. First level appeal is to Regional Manager, address is above on the report. Page 3 of 3. End of Report.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 102417(b)Type B

    OPERATION OF A FAMILY CHILD CARE HOME

    102417(b) Operation of a Family Child Care Home: The home shall be kept clean and orderly, with heating and ventilation for safety and comfort.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA’s interviews, S3 and S4 disclosed that there is too much clutter in the home. C1 and S2 disclosed the home is messy and there is too much stuff. One out 3 parents stated concerns over the amount of clutter in the home.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 17, 2024 inspection of FERNANDO, RASIKA & FERNANDO, THARINDU?

This was a complaint inspection of FERNANDO, RASIKA & FERNANDO, THARINDU on December 17, 2024. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to FERNANDO, RASIKA & FERNANDO, THARINDU on December 17, 2024?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "102417(b) Operation of a Family Child Care Home: The home shall be kept clean and orderly, with heating and ventilation ..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.