Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

KIDDIE ACADEMYLicense 364845370
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

- It was also alleged that Facility staff did not properly report incidents. Information obtained stated that facility staff allegedly did not report child to child injury incidents. Other information obtained stated that staff understand how to report incidents and always follow their normal procedures for reporting incidents to authorized representatives of children. These processes include writing the incident on an appropriate behavior report with detailed notes as well as obtaining signatures from the parent, director, and teacher. Additionally, information gathered stated that the teachers maintain visual supervision of children and therefore teachers do not fail to notice incidents that would need to be reported. - It was also alleged that facility staff left children unattended. Information gathered alleged that facility staff left children unattended in a classroom. Other information gathered, including video footage, showed that observing the video camera footage from the cameras inside the classrooms does not show all locations in the classroom, therefore viewing the camera footage does not provide enough information to determine if teachers are or are not present in the classroom. Additionally, information gathered stated that facility staff do not leave children unattended. Additionally, information gathered stated that the teachers were in the classroom at the time of the alleged incident and that an appropriate amount of teachers were assigned to the classroom for the amount of children present. - It was also alleged that lack of supervision resulted in children injuring other children Information gathered alleged that teachers are not providing supervision resulting in children injuring other children. Additionally, information gathered stated that during a recent child to child biting incident, it took facility staff about 10 seconds to respond to the incident. Other information gathered stated that facility staff do not have problems with maintaining supervision. Due to conflicting information obtained about the alleged allegations, the evidence collected was not sufficient to substantiate or refute the above allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Appeal Rights issued and discussed with facility representative and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. Exit interview conducted, and report was reviewed with the facility representative Pamela Fox. A notice of site visit was given to facility representative Pamela Fox and must remain posted on, or immediately adjacent to, the interior side of the main door for 30 days. This report must be made available to the public for 3 years. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 101233(a)(2)Type A

    101233 Personal Rights – (a) The licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the following personal rights: (2) To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment to meet his/her needs.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on the interview and record review, their were 9 biting incidents from a single child, 4 of which broke skin, over the course of 3 months. The facility did not implement anything substantial that reduced the amount of biting from C1 or to ensure that all children’s Personal Rights were not being violated, which poses/posed an immediate Personal Rights risk to the children in care.

  • REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the June 20, 2025 inspection of KIDDIE ACADEMY?

This was a complaint inspection of KIDDIE ACADEMY on June 20, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to KIDDIE ACADEMY on June 20, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.