Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensee said the bathroom, including the toilet, is cleaned as needed throughout the day. Licensee said children are only allowed in the front room/living room, which is designated as the children\342\200\231s play area. Licensee said the gate she installed at the end of the front room prevents children from accessing other areas of the home. Licensee said she and/or one of her assistants are always with the children and are never allowed in any other rooms in the home. An interview on 9/25/2025 was conducted with the licensee\342\200\231s assistant (A1) between 9:17am - 9:39am, who denied the allegations and stated that the licensee maintains the front playroom and the bathroom, areas that the children have access to, clean and sanitized. A1 said children scatter toys while playing with them. A1 said she and the licensee put toys away throughout the day if too many are left out by children to prevent toys from becoming tripping hazards. A1 said children spill food on the floor when they eat, and she and the licensee clean it up after the last child finishes eating. A1 said supplies will get scattered when children work on a project, which she and the licensee clean up after the children complete the project. A1 said she and the licensee are with children at all times and are not allowed in other rooms in the home. A1 said trash is taken out as needed and never allowed to overflow. A1 said children do not have access to dangerous items such as cleaning supplies, electrical outlets, or choking hazards. In interviews conducted on 11/7/2025 with Parent #1 (P1), Parent #2 (P2), and Parent #3 (P3) between 1:40pm \342\200\223 2:07 pm, and in interviews conducted on 11/26/2025 with Parent #4, Parent #5, and Parent #6 (P6) between 1:29pm \342\200\223 2:58pm denied seeing or having knowledge of children having access to any item considered dangerous to children. P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, and P6 stated that the licensee and/or her assistant are always seen supervising children in care. P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, and P6 said that when children are inside the home, they are in the front room while the rest of the home is gated off, preventing children from accessing other rooms or areas in the home. P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, and P6 said the home is kept clean, and that the trash cans are not seen overflowing. P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, and P6 said toys are scattered throughout the playroom, which is expected when children are in care. P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, and P6 stated that food is seen on the floor when children are eating; however, they denied seeing food scattered across the play area. P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, and P6 stated they could not comment on the bathroom's cleanliness, as they had not had a reason to be in there. During LPA\342\200\231s inspection on 9/25/2025, LPA observed a bottle of Clorox bathroom cleaner in the cabinet located under the bathroom sink and a pair of scissors in a drawer, difficult to open in the bathroom cabinet, which the licensee immediately relocated to a cabinet off-limits to children. During the inspection on 9/25/2025, LPA observed the four children in care, all which were in diapers. No older children were in care who required the use of the bathroom. A gate placed at the end of the living room/playroom prevented the children from accessing any other rooms or areas in the home. During today\342\200\231s inspection, LPA toured the home and found the bathroom, front room, converted garage into a play room to be clean, sanitized, and organized. No harmful items were observed accessible to children in care. Although the allegations that the licensee did not properly maintain the home and that the licensee did not prevent the daycare children from having access to harmful material may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred, and the findings are unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, and the report was reviewed with licensee Maria Palominos. Appeal rights were provided, a Notice of Site Visit was given, and it must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100. All licensing reports are public information and must be made available upon request for at least three years.

Citations

7 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 1, 2025 inspection of PALOMINOS, MARIA FAMILY CHILD CARE HOME?

This was a complaint inspection of PALOMINOS, MARIA FAMILY CHILD CARE HOME on December 1, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to PALOMINOS, MARIA FAMILY CHILD CARE HOME on December 1, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.