Skip to main content

On this page

Public Record

Pico De Loro

License 336407734Residential Care - ElderlyPerris, CA
11 citations on record

Is this your facility?Correct anything the record gets wrong or is out of date.

Researching this facility professionally?Book a 15-minute call

Share this facilityTwitterLinkedInEmail

About this facility

Operating details and county context

Operating details

Capacity
45 residents
Phone
(951) 943-8081
Address
620 North Perris Blvd
Licensed since

Riverside County context

574*CCLD

Total facilities

3.7*CCLD

Avg citations

7.5*CCLD

Avg visits

2.6*CCLD

Avg complaint visits

*CCLD: California Community Care Licensing Division. Updated weekly. Last refresh .

Citations

11 citations on record

Every regulation cited on a CCLD inspection of this facility, sourced from the public record. Each row links to the visit’s inspector narrative.

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

2025

  • 87468.2(a)(27)Type A

    87468.2 Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities (a) In addition…residents in privately operated residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (27) To keep, have access to, and use their own personal possessions, including … to…be allowed to spend their own money, unless limited by statute or regulation. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review the licensee used R1’s personal and incidental funds to pay to pay rent owed by R1 against R1’s wishes. This poses an immediate health safety or personal rights risk to residents in care.

2024

  • 1569.695(c)Type B

    Based on LPA Delgado's observation, interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in drill documentation was requested and unable to be provided was which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87203Type B

    Based on LPA Delgado's observation, interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in interior structural changes have been made to include bedroom for future residents and another space for live-in caregiver accomodations, twin beds for staff inside the medication area which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87303(e)(6)Type B

    Based on LPA Delgado's observation and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in which common bathroom next to Room #14 had a broken shower handle and sink faucet had a broken hot water knob which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87309(a)Type B

    Based on LPA Delgado's observation and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in shampoo bottles, body spray, body wash was sitting on top of the common bathroom sink unattended which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87555(b)(23)Type B

    Based on LPA Delgado's observation and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in hamburger meat was left out on sink counter, cooked food was left on counter, foods inside refrigerators was not in stored in containers which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 1569.695(a)(2)Type B

    Based on LPA Delgado's observation and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in emergency food could not be differentiate from regular food supply for residents which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87457(c)Type B

    87457 Pre-Admission Appraisal – General (c) Prior to admission a determination of the prospective resident's suitability for admission shall be completed and shall include an appraisal of his/her individual service needs...with the admission ...This requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above completeing R1's preadmission appraisal prior to the resident being admitted to the facility which posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 1569.655(a)Type B

    Increase in fee rates for elderly residents...: (a)If a licensee of a residential care facility for the elderly increases the rates... the licensee shall provide no less than 60 days' prior written notice to the residents...This requirement was not bet as evidenced by: Based on interviews, Licensee failed to give R1's Power of Attorny a 60-day written notice regarding the fee increase and only gave the POA a verbal notice. This poses a potential risk to residents in care.

2022

  • 87468.1(a)(6)Type A

    Based on LPA Delgado's observation and interview, LPA observed the front door to have a deadbolt lock and the dining area door had to be unlocked by key that was utilized by the Supervisor. The licensee did not comply with the section cited above in which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

2021

  • 87468.2(a)(20)Type A

    Additional Personal Rights of Residents in ...Facilities: (a) In addition to the rights listed ... residents...shall have all of the following personal rights: (20) To be protected from involuntary transfers, discharges, and evictions.... This requirement was not met ass evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted, the Licensee did not comply with the above regulation with one resident. The Licensee refused to readmit R1 after hospital discharge due to R1 being positive for COVID-19. R1 was subsequently transferred to SNF. This was an immedaite personal rights violation of R1.

Inspection record

31 visits on record since 2021. Most recent on 2026-04-08.

5 routine inspections, 21 complaint visits. 15 complaints on record, 3 of 15 substantiated.

11 citations across the record on file

Nearby

Other licensed assisted living facilities in Perris

FAQ

Common questions about this facility

Is Pico De Loro licensed in California?

Yes, Pico De Loro is currently licensed in California. It has been licensed since 2003.

How many citations does Pico De Loro have?

Pico De Loro has 11 citations on record: 3 Type A (more serious) and 8 Type B citations. It has received 31 visits (5 inspections, 21 complaint visits, 5 other visits).

When was Pico De Loro last inspected?

Pico De Loro was last inspected on April 8, 2026 (6 weeks ago). California inspects licensed assisted living facilities (RCFEs) on a periodic basis or following a complaint.

What type of assisted living facility is Pico De Loro?

Pico De Loro is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE), which is a licensed assisted living facility serving older adults with a licensed capacity of 45 residents. It is located in Perris, Riverside County, California.

How does Pico De Loro compare to other assisted living facilities in Riverside County?

Pico De Loro has 11 citations. The county average is 3.7 citations per facility. There are 574 assisted living facilities in Riverside County.

Does Pico De Loro have any serious violations?

Pico De Loro has 3 Type A citations on record. Type A citations indicate conditions that pose an immediate health or safety risk to residents. Review the inspection timeline above for details on each citation.

Has Pico De Loro had any complaint inspections?

Pico De Loro has received 21 complaint-triggered inspections. 3 resulted in substantiated findings. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern to CCLD.

Next steps for this record

If this is your facility,and correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.